Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 66530 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2006 11:33:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Dec 2006 11:33:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 49878 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2006 11:33:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 49843 invoked by uid 500); 21 Dec 2006 11:33:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-dev@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 49832 invoked by uid 99); 21 Dec 2006 11:33:45 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 03:33:45 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ruchith.fernando@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.189 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.189] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.189) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 03:33:35 -0800 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id o63so2731520nfa for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 03:33:13 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=V3zgf5DKebKVvOvqQl5NgqGWvIqRMtn50TQgcC6gJcSO8rLgtBjRe/6AQe3iNRe3IrHWFPBlx9+EADr9zKoePcMooSf6vHK++r64VpRsX/lxdu5rSDOwGNcXfLEOPtCanyfxWOx5XtLapTx+XGUTw0NoB+tDJxAbCigCBqbr7IU= Received: by 10.48.210.16 with SMTP id i16mr10521610nfg.1166700793857; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 03:33:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.223.20 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 03:33:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <559c463d0612210333m56b5187brbb2ee6a408b539e7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 17:03:13 +0530 From: "Ruchith Fernando" To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org, chinthaka@opensource.lk Subject: Re: [axis2] release planning In-Reply-To: <458982F1.5040602@opensource.lk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1166539837.2847.28.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4588BE59.8040801@opensource.lk> <458982F1.5040602@opensource.lk> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 12/21/06, Eran Chinthaka wrote: > While agreeing with all the comments, let me disclose one more dimension > for this. > > Axis2 depends on various other projects like Woden, XmlShema, Axiom, > etc., For us to achieve what Sanjiva had suggested, then we should have > a plan for WS project, as a whole, at least among whatever connected > projects. > > So I feel this is something that we might need help from all the other > projects and should be taken in to the PMC as well. I agree with Chinthaka ... So shall we discuss this in general@ws.a.o ? Thanks, Ruchtih > > -- Chinthaka > > Ajith Ranabahu wrote: > > Hi, > > As much a fan I am for 'release early release often', I have a feeling > > that two months of development may not yield enough changes to fully > > constitute a release (just a feeling though). So would it be sensible > > to do 4 month develop/test/release cycle rather than a 3 month one ? > > (3 months development ,1 month test/bugfix/document altogether 3 > > releases per year) > > The time gap allows the gathering of more usecases and gives people > > room to play around. By the time we get to the next 'bug fix' stage, > > people would have played around with the earlier release and found all > > the issues. > > > > Ajith > > > > On 12/19/06, Deepal Jayasinghe wrote: > >> I am big +1 for this approach. > >> Let's start that process immediately after 1.1.1 release . > >> > >> Thanks > >> Deepal > >> > >> Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > >> > >> >Folks, I'd like to suggest that we try to do 3-monthly releases .. with > >> >2 months of development and one more of wrapping up / packaging. I'm > >> >motivated to suggest this after the debacle of the 1.1 release .. we > >> >spent more than *6 months* releasing it and to me that's just crazy. > >> > > >> >Release early, release often is an important open source mantra. Given > >> >that we're still in a fairly rapid innovation mode, this is even more > >> >important. > >> > > >> >This also will force us to work thru a bit of a roadmap so users know > >> >what features to expect in what version (to whatever extent possible to > >> >do that in an open source project .. I'm not suggesting we plan > >> >everything). > >> > > >> >Thoughts? > >> > > >> >Sanjiva. > >> > > >> > > >> > >> -- > >> Thanks, > >> Deepal > >> ................................................................ > >> "The highest tower is built one brick at a time" > >> > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > -- www.ruchith.org www.wso2.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org