Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 90350 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2006 11:10:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Oct 2006 11:10:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 61129 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 11:10:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 61076 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2006 11:10:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-dev@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 60850 invoked by uid 99); 2 Oct 2006 11:10:07 -0000 Received: from idunn.apache.osuosl.org (HELO idunn.apache.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.84) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 04:10:07 -0700 Authentication-Results: idunn.apache.osuosl.org header.from=hemapani@gmail.com; domainkeys=good X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE DomainKey-Status: good X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 Received: from [64.233.182.184] ([64.233.182.184:40382] helo=nf-out-0910.google.com) by idunn.apache.osuosl.org (ecelerity 2.1.1.8 r(12930)) with ESMTP id 4A/26-16499-A83F0254 for ; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 04:10:02 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x29so1300781nfb for ; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 04:09:59 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GYwmodkUHnR0wyGFg0z9U4F0iKqsT42fjhKutr9Lz26r4qj7tRvGj8KlCTd0PY0dKVTm9Y6u6GzzgV2FvSb/iiVhLKvKUbC2iPmUuz7HjnDCnHx2CtxavBA6yL/yaq0EEKwJ2IDSvH44UCbtM66bffDG2pncK/xz/HxRHO22OsM= Received: by 10.49.41.12 with SMTP id t12mr4671804nfj; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 04:09:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.88.1 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 04:09:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 06:09:59 -0500 From: "Srinath Perera" To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org, chinthaka@opensource.lk Subject: Re: [Axis2] Adding revision number while resolving issues In-Reply-To: <4520AF16.3040305@opensource.lk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4520AF16.3040305@opensource.lk> X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N +1 !! and may be we should keep adding the best practises to developer guide .. to make sure they are kept track of On 10/2/06, Eran Chinthaka wrote: > Hi, > > When you fix a bug and resolve a JIRA, let's make it a best practice to > include the revision number in the comment you put while resolving the > JIRA. > > I'm now trying to fix a bug related elementFormDefault="qualified", but > seems this was fixed earlier by Ajith. But when I use the current build > I get the same error. So I wanted to see what he has done to re-fix it > but I have no clue which version to look for. > > I've seen Dims doing this, and once in a while I also did it. But shall > we all make it a best practice and do that always? A humble request. > > -- Chinthaka > > > > -- ============================ Srinath Perera: http://www.cs.indiana.edu/~hperera/ http://www.bloglines.com/blog/hemapani --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org