axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alan M. Feldstein" <afel...@earthlink.net>
Subject Re: [Axis2] What to include in the Axis2 1.1 distributions??
Date Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:01:37 GMT
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  <title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Eran Chinthaka wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid453312A2.90402@opensource.lk" type="cite">
  <pre wrap="">What Srinath is trying to explain is about the released artifacts that
are going to be listed in the release page. Like war, std-bin, min-bin, etc.
For your requirement, we can host all the released jars in maven repo,
which you can directly get from. For example, you will see
axis2-adb-1.1.jar, axis2-kernel-1.1.jar, etc. In this way, you or your
customers are not required to download the whole release. Does that
sound good for you?

  </pre>
</blockquote>
Eran,<br>
<br>
+1<br>
for axis2-adb-1.1.jar in
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/axis2/">http://www.apache.org/dist/java-repository/axis2/</a><br>
<blockquote cite="mid453312A2.90402@opensource.lk" type="cite">
  <pre wrap="">

Alan M. Feldstein wrote:
  </pre>
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <pre wrap=""> Srinath Perera wrote:
    </pre>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <pre wrap="">Our buid will always build a ADB jar as well. You can get it from
there. But on the Axis2 relese I am proposing to put one Axis2 jar
with all the code in . Becouse it will help 95% of the use cases!!

If you are just using that class ..but not Axis2.  I see  no reason we
should tie down Axis2 release jar by it.

      </pre>
    </blockquote>
    <pre wrap="">For my development work, I can of course get ADB from your build.

My customers, however, will be instructed to use a released Axis2 jar
(with a minimum version number of 1.1), not a nightly build. In fact,
I've tagged but withheld two product releases that depend on
UnsignedLong, whose bugs are blockers in Axis2 1.0.

I agree that the vast majority of Axis2 use cases would enjoy the
convenience of a single jar, but consider the fact that the Java
language lacks unsigned types. The principle of reuse teaches use to go
find existing classes. Providing ADB separately encourages this reuse.
This way, you provide something useful to the broader Java community,
not just Web services. When you have created something that is generally
useful, I say that it should be kept separate.

    </pre>
  </blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<meta name="generator"
 content="HTML Tidy for Solaris (vers 1st March 2004), see www.w3.org">
<title>Alan M. Feldstein</title>
<p>Alan Feldstein</p>
<img src="cid:part1.09010204.04010804@earthlink.net"
 alt="Cosmic Horizon logo" height="55" width="101">
<p><a href="http://www.alanfeldstein.com/">http://www.alanfeldstein.com/</a></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>

Mime
View raw message