axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanj...@opensource.lk>
Subject Re: [Axis2] ServiceClient questions
Date Tue, 19 Sep 2006 03:11:25 GMT
On Fri, 2006-09-15 at 11:59 +0530, Deepal Jayasinghe wrote:
> >That doesn't make any sense IMO .. the reason we use the anon ops is to
> >make the simple case possible. If someone's getting at the operation
> >client and doing stuff there better know the name of the operation.
> >  
> >
> Yes , I understand that. But the scenario I am talking about also making
> the simple case simple. I mean if we can give a simple way to create an
> operation client why shouldn't we do that. So if some one just want to
> create operationClient to invoke a service shy should we ask that guy to ;
>  - first create AxisService with all the AxisOperation
>  - and then create ServiceClient using that
>  - then use that service client to create operationClient
> 
> I really like to have the following steps to create operation client
>   - create ServiceClient using its default constructor
>  - Then create operation client

If you want to do that then you have to support a model of allowing the
user to get an anonymous operation client without having to give that a
special name that we came up with. That is, it doesn't make sense to
make the ANON_* stuff part of user's world- just allow then for the user
to pass null as the name and assume that means ANON_whatever (the
corresponding anonymous operation). 

That way you make the simple case simple without introducing new
knowledge the user must learn.

Is there really a meaningful usecase for someone to create an operation
client yet not have a real service (via  WSDL or an AxisService)?

Sanjiva.




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org


Mime
View raw message