axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jeremy Hughes" <hugh...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [Axis2] Time to have next release
Date Wed, 09 Aug 2006 09:42:22 GMT
Dims,

Hi, I just saw you made changes to core and codegen modules so that
Woden isn't required [1]. I'd like to know what you (and the list)
thinks about claiming any degree of WSDL 2.0 support in Axis2 1.1. I'm
actually +0 about this, but if some support is going to be claimed
then I'd like to make sure Woden has an up to date milestone release
ready in time for Axis2's release - if only so that users that want to
try it out don't have to use a snapshot jar of Woden.

[1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-axis-cvs/200608.mbox/%3c20060808164216.610891A981A@eris.apache.org%3e


Thanks,
Jeremy


On 8/8/06, Jeremy Hughes <hughesj@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There's some WSDL 2.0 support in WSDL2Java. This uses the Woden
> Incabator podling which. The equivalent support in Java2WSDL isn't
> there - I guess this is mostly because Woden doesn't currently support
> output of WSDL 2.0 documents :-)
>
> Either Axis2 should include Woden in the 1.1 distribution or include
> instructions on how to get Woden in order to use the WSDL 2.0 function
> of WSDL2Java.
>
> Last time I looked, Axis2 was relying on a Woden *snapshot* in the
> maven repo. I think if Axis2 is going to include the Woden jar then it
> should be a released level of Woden. The latest release is M5 and M6
> is currently being proposed as Oct 2nd. Feels like something sooner
> might be required. BTW: A parallel general@i.a.o discussion [1]
> discusses a special repo for incubating projects so that other
> projects can depend on their releases rather than just snapshots -
> I'll discuss on woden-dev about putting Woden milestones up there.
>
> I posted a few weeks back about Axis2 relying on the Woden podling [2]
> and whether there are issues w.r.t its inclusion. My concerns (to try
> to do the right thing from an Apache p.o.v) were:
>
> if an Apache project makes an official release including an Apache
> Incubator podling then is that providing some level of inappropriate
> endorsement to the podling
>
> I feel that since Axis2 simply uses Woden as part of its WSDL2Java
> implementation then maybe just something in the README indicating a
> podling is required would be sufficient. Unless of course Woden isn't
> going to get packaged with Axis2 distro.
>
> [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200608.mbox/%3c31cc37360608011216n3b7e6e78w9fe019007f5afc2f@mail.gmail.com%3e
> [2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-axis-dev/200608.mbox/%3cadbf02b10608010843s4562ecf7r485ae114ff962033@mail.gmail.com%3e
>
> Anyone have thoughts on this?
>
> Thanks,
> Jeremy
>
> On 8/8/06, Deepal Jayasinghe <deepal@opensource.lk> wrote:
> > Hi All;
> >
> > After Axis2 1.0 release we have done a number of feature improvements
> > and  bug fixing  , so  I think its time to think about the next release.
> > And of course there were many request for a release in the mailing list
> > too. I think we can do a release after ApacheCon Asia ( I am bit busy
> > with apacheCon) , with the above improvements + bug fixes . I update the
> > wiki (http://wiki.apache.org/ws/FrontPage/Axis2/releases/1.1 )  , and
> > need to identify the JIRAs we need to fix before next release too  :).
> >
> > Please be kind enough to make your suggestions on this release.
> >
> > Here is my +1 for the next release Axis2 1.1,
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> > Deepal
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >
> >
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: axis-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org


Mime
View raw message