Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of davanum@gmail.com designates
 64.233.162.201 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=W+AgXYoo+pTrJg+DedriJvMQjeSXyuHPdbXyv+oHqKYQQddDEqA0fGb42w/TQADMGzMbX6IaomOiJdMYN0tr/38TvXWdj4FmeBb94lBRUenH721ohOrG8jzOY5yCakbCsXPvtqBYBGhYq1YVUg4P53hon6GS2C7+t9gdz5HHM7o=
Message-ID: <19e0530f0605121325i72ec6111x6cc2be8a2eccad17@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 16:25:47 -0400
From: "Davanum Srinivas" <davanum@gmail.com>
Reply-To: dims@apache.org
To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [AXIS] 1.4 WSDL2Java generates non-compilable code
In-Reply-To: <031801c6746e$056e0a00$8e6bfb52@Pentium4>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <031801c6746e$056e0a00$8e6bfb52@Pentium4>

Sure. Please  submit a patch

thanks,
dims

On 5/10/06, Remy Bertrand <remysylvie.bertrand@free.fr> wrote:
>
>
> When WSDL contains <xsd:extension> in type definitions, wsdl2java can
> generate non compilable code.
>
> I have identified 2 cases of non compilable code :
>
> - Generated class don't extends anything, but a constructor calling
> super(...) is generated (in this case super refer to java.lang.Object).
> - Generated class don't extends anything, a constructor initializing each
> attribute is generated, but attribute name is replaced by "paramx".
>
> I wrote the attached wsdl that reproduce the two cases. Please focus on t=
he
> schema part only, rest of the file is a poor cut and paste.
>
>
> After looking in the code
> (wsdl/toJava/JavaBeanWriter.java), my understanding is that
> tests to decide if a class extends another or not (and thus what
> constructor(s) must be outputted) are not coherent.
>
> - In method writeFullConstructor(), a test type.isSimpleType() is done to
> check if constructor must be written.
> - In method writeSimpleConstructors(), a test extendType !=3D null is don=
e to
> check if constructor must be written.
> - In method getExtendsText() (which is called to generate the "extends"
> statement at the beginning of the class), a more complex test is used:
> (extendType !=3D null) && !isUnion() && (!type.isSimpleType() ||
> !extendType.isBaseType()) && (extendType.getDimensions().length() =3D=3D =
0)
>
> Thats why sometimes writeFullConstructor emits a constructor calling
> super(...) even if the class don't really inherits from anything.
> Or why writeSimpleConstructors emits a constructor to initialize every
> attributes even if the informations to write this constructor are not
> available.
>
>
> If you agree with my analyze, i can open a JIRA reports and submit a patc=
h
> that i wrote trying to resolve the problem on my (multiple) wsdl.
>
> Thanks
> R=E9my Bertrand
>
>
>


--=20
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/