Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4434EF74.2050707@opensource.lk>
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 16:37:40 +0600
From: Deepal Jayasinghe <deepal@opensource.lk>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Axis2 next release
References: <4430F1AC.6010004@opensource.lk>
 <1144066168.18904.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <1144066168.18904.1.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

hi All

Lets have a release candidate of Axis2, on 7th April (if everything goes
well), put up on a publicly available place on Apache, so that anyone
interested can download and test it. This will not be a formal release,
but this will become the RC for 1.0 release.

Lets leave the release candidate for about one week. If everything goes well, lets release Axis2 1.0 on 21st April, 2006.

And I did not get enough +1 for the RC1  :(, dose that mean you guys are not happy with the RC1.

any comments ...

~Deepal

Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:

>Big +1 for moving ahead with this plan .. we've been working at this for
>a long time and its time to draw the line and declare our first victory.
>Of course 1.0 is not the end of the road and we have a lot more good
>stuff to come!
>
>Sanjiva.
>
>
>On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 15:58 +0600, Deepal Jayasinghe wrote:
>

> Hi all,
>
> We've been working towards a 1.0 for a long time and as discussed in
> the thread http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=axis-dev&m=114285537804599&w=2,
>
> I would like to propose the following plan for the release.
>
>    1.  Fix items listed in the wiki at
> http://wiki.apache.org/ws/FrontPage/Axis2/releases/1.0
>    2.  Do a release candidate (since we don not have the notion of
> RC's this would be called 0.96)
>          (Features and API's will be frozen in this point)
>    3.  Leave the RC for about a week or so for the people to play
> around and find issues (which might be there)
>    4.  name the .96 release as 1.0 and do a formal 1.0 release  (with
> bugs fixed of course)
>
>
> here is my +1 for the release .
>

-- 
Thanks,
Deepal
................................................................
~Future is Open~