Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 22363 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2006 15:14:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Apr 2006 15:14:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 99045 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2006 15:14:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 98580 invoked by uid 500); 11 Apr 2006 15:14:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-dev@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 98569 invoked by uid 99); 11 Apr 2006 15:14:19 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 08:14:19 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [209.68.5.17] (HELO relay03.pair.com) (209.68.5.17) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 11 Apr 2006 08:14:18 -0700 Received: (qmail 14720 invoked from network); 11 Apr 2006 15:13:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.4?) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 11 Apr 2006 15:13:56 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 222.165.180.10 Subject: Re: [Axis2] Axiom performance improvements From: Sanjiva Weerawarana To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org In-Reply-To: <44388EA9.90205@sosnoski.com> References: <44388EA9.90205@sosnoski.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Lanka Software Foundation Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 21:13:33 +0600 Message-Id: <1144768414.23890.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 16:33 +1200, Dennis Sosnoski wrote: > Nice job by whoever did the Axiom performance improvements! I didn't > think you'd be able to get Axiom to match the faster document models > without major rewrites. What were the main things you changed? > > Now if somebody can do the same for the Axiom memory usage I'll be > *really* impressed. ;-) Its the classic space vs. time tradeoff .. we are focused on time 'cause the way to deal with space is by deferring and doing the right thing at the right time. IMO that's the balance we must keep. Sanjiva.