Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 91427 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2006 16:22:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2006 16:22:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 25565 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2006 16:22:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 25552 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2006 16:22:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-dev@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 25536 invoked by uid 99); 24 Feb 2006 16:22:50 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 08:22:50 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of davanum@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.195 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.195] (HELO xproxy.gmail.com) (66.249.82.195) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 08:22:49 -0800 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t14so248367wxc for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 08:22:28 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bhVVMvZVUzDkS3FCskx/xHWOStrzqyFrOSJyzUFPa2Wzbymphiv3B76bdCotUBbkyAtgnjaD1knU5NS+YegP3iaiWJuvL4dDGA5MkL6x4lp8S0o8I9gSOXpTWTBvGLuWqi0W0s2knobXYQZ5lOp1k6cCyvjyMFzYUynKbMFsBvU= Received: by 10.11.100.40 with SMTP id x40mr120256cwb; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 08:22:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.11.120.19 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Feb 2006 08:22:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <19e0530f0602240822q6b4aae23wf5ebecc16933df89@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:22:28 -0500 From: "Davanum Srinivas" Reply-To: dims@apache.org To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: Any chance of an official Axis 1.4 Release? Cc: dev@geronimo.apache.org In-Reply-To: <43FF185D.9050004@hogstrom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <339A742F-C4AE-4356-AA98-97F045FD4E64@visi.com> <43FED669.2010904@objectweb.org> <43FF185D.9050004@hogstrom.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Matt, David +1 to release 1_4 branch as-is. David, Can you please start a VOTE on axis-dev@ to that effect? and volunteer as the release manager. thanks, dims On 2/24/06, Matt Hogstrom wrote: > Dims, > > Geronimo is going to be releasing 1.1 at the end of March. It would be r= eally > great if the Axis Dev team could support its Geronimo brethern (*Matt say= s cup > in hand*) by releasing an official 1.4 Axis version. Otherwise we're goi= ng to > have to fork the Axis code for the 3rd time to get a release out. > > Is there something I can do (besides my incessant whining) to help get th= is done? > > Seeing as you have a new baby (at least its imminent) you should have all= sorts > of time in the wee hours of the morning :) > > Thanks sir. > > Matt > > Guillaume Sauthier wrote: > > Hi > > The AXIS_1_4_FINAL tag/branch is integrated in JOnAS and pass all our > > tests (including TCK). > > > > Is the 1.4 code very different of the trunk code now ? > > > > I'm in favor of releasing the 1.4 branch as is. > > And if there is issues with Geronimo and/or others, we should release a > > 1.4.1 based on trunk... > > > > What do you think ? > > > > Regards > > Guillaume > > > > > > > > David Blevins wrote: > > > >> On Feb 23, 2006, at 10:32 AM, Tom Jordahl wrote: > >> > >>> I don't know who or why the 1.4 branch was created, but standard > >>> procedure is to always release the trunk. > >> > >> > >> > >> I think Dims created it in hopes to get a 1.4 release out to be > >> included in Geronimo 1.0. But it was never released and is really > >> old now compared to trunk. > >> > >> Hey Dims, can you weigh in on this? I'm not really comfortable yet > >> making unilateral decisions on big release and versioning topics. > >> Some hand holding would be good while I learn the ropes. > >> > >> -David > >> > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: David Blevins [mailto:david.blevins@visi.com] > >>> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 4:43 PM > >>> To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org > >>> Cc: dev@geronimo.apache.org > >>> Subject: Re: Any chance of an official Axis 1.4 Release? > >>> > >>> I can certainly carry out my duties to help on this one. > >>> > >>> I guess I'd be looking at some direction from my fellow axis people > >>> on what we want to do with the 1.4 "final" branch. Specifically, do > >>> we want to release trunk or the 1.4 branch? > >>> > >>> -David > >>> > >>> On Feb 17, 2006, at 10:35 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: > >>> > >>>> Geronimo is looking towards its 1.1 release sometime in the next > >>>> month or so. No hard date yet. It would be useful to have an > >>>> official 1.4 release. Any chance that will be happening soon? > >>>> > >>>> Matt > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > -- Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/