Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 39512 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 14:31:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 14:31:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 76571 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2006 14:31:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 75967 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jan 2006 14:31:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-dev@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 75956 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jan 2006 14:31:07 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:31:07 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of atmanes@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.207 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.207] (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.207) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:31:06 -0800 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i32so3500884wra for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:30:45 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=aTpTuhAOi4JMXDYa80fjexrRxgE/HBb8uhcRyGILvcDmv/bY4z4Symsj6Ui2MGI9Z995bJMjv5SMla/K0g3B0rTSyy3X+XolbKS+AyS6Zr532uC8E23WzRDg77uWSlJGM38a3FxKau5IZ/VnqzZuF3pNjS4iLdbp7+5veRXtvCs= Received: by 10.54.114.7 with SMTP id m7mr9563956wrc; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:30:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.100.1 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:30:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:30:45 -0500 From: Anne Thomas Manes To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: WSDL 2.0 is a non-goal for Axis2 1.0? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_81160_32023735.1136903445066" References: <19e0530f0601100447t77e3a2c5kd40df5121a8ac3a9@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_Part_81160_32023735.1136903445066 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline According to the WSDL 2.0 Working Group, they don't expect to produce a Proposed Recommendation until the second half of 2006. We'll be lucky to se= e WSDL 2.0 finalized before the end of the year. I agree with Dims. WSDL 2.0 should be a non-goal for Axis 2 1.0. Anne On 1/10/06, Ajith Ranabahu wrote: > > Ahum... > Are you serious Dims ? I mean about getting rid of WOM ? For me it seems > getting rid of WOM is not that easy (codegenerator completely depends on = it) > and the WSDL 2.0 is taking shape and will be finalized soon (which means > we should be supporting it anyway) > > > > On 1/10/06, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > > > Team, > > > > Let's get rid of of WOM and declare that we will use only wsdl4j which > > implies hence WSDL 2.0 is a non-goal for Axis2 1.0. IF we get a > > release from woden that includes parsing WSDL1.1 THEN we will > > reconsider. > > > > sounds like a plan? > > > > thanks, > > dims > > > > -- > > Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/ > > > > > > -- > Ajith Ranabahu ------=_Part_81160_32023735.1136903445066 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline According to the WSDL 2.0 Working Group, they don't expect to produce a Proposed Recommendation until the second half of 2006. We'll be lucky to see WSDL 2.0 finalized before the end of the year.

I agree with Dims. WSDL 2.0 should be a non-goal for Axis 2 1.0.

Anne

On 1/10/06, Ajith Ranabahu <ajith.ranabahu@gmail.com> wrote:
Ahum...
Are you serious Dims ? I mean about getting rid of WOM ? For me it seems getting rid of WOM is not that easy (codegenerator completely depends on it) and the WSDL 2.0 is taking shape and will be finalized soon (which means we should be supporting it anyway)




On 1/10/06, Davanum Srinivas <davan= um@gmail.com > wrote:
Team,

Let's get rid of of WOM and declare that we will use only wsdl= 4j which
implies hence WSDL 2.0 is a non-goal for Axis2 1.0. IF we get a=
release from woden that includes parsing WSDL1.1 THEN we will
recons= ider.

sounds like a plan?

thanks,
dims

--
Davanum Sri= nivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/



--
Ajit= h Ranabahu

------=_Part_81160_32023735.1136903445066--