Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <43DE0205.2090609@opensource.lk>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 18:09:41 +0600
From: Eran Chinthaka <chinthaka@opensource.lk>
Reply-To: chinthaka@opensource.lk
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [AXIS2]Size difference between .94 and .95
References: <POEHIPNLJGDMKMMBHILOCEGMCAAA.soumadeep@infravio.com>
In-Reply-To: <POEHIPNLJGDMKMMBHILOCEGMCAAA.soumadeep@infravio.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 
ok, there is bit of a confusion in the usage of words here.

Axis2-core-0.94 jar contains classes from common, xml, core and wsdl
modules. This is only for the release. But during the development
process, core jar contains classes only from core module. So the word
core is bit confusing.

I thought of renaming core in to kernel, but didn't get enough time to
get it approved from the list b4 the release.

- -- Chinthaka

Soumadeep wrote:

> There is a big difference in size between .94(789kb) and
> .95-SNAPSHOT(488kb) axis2 core jars.
>
> Any reasons??
>
> Thanks Soumadeep
>
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
 
iD8DBQFD3gIFjON2uBzUhh8RApYCAJ9DpB/qLyVl81VEBZl0JP3WQe9ATwCeKSQn
pN9bp2lGb1gZEnxR8fv1Xm0=
=ybVI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----