Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of davanum@gmail.com designates
 66.249.82.207 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=XRCvo2pWho/qaKXziYvZEhp8TwSGssFh+tF/jVR+wCI9BibteHwhkOMhceXdZu/2ecz39OJMt7VbA5Wo4ABp9aHHfiXrWD9z+Bqb7tEEVV5OID4MUUwNgiusinWU47Kk3U01NwOEE3ZdrAkXoIxuBlu8MkiPxYaeRZcYTKcz0DY=
Message-ID: <19e0530f0601310510x35b5a7f0qd9442278a3f5d473@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 08:10:45 -0500
From: Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com>
Reply-To: dims@apache.org
To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [axis2] move axiom to ws-commons
In-Reply-To: <43DF60D4.20806@apache.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <1138623445.16739.29.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <19e0530f0601301050j666c1c6cp315120ec094e2d05@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1138652979.26043.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <19e0530f0601301256j291871aeqf9c94a269a2ede23@mail.gmail.com>
	 <88f5d710601310152s22f0b0bex41fda73166267c31@mail.gmail.com>
	 <43DF60D4.20806@apache.org>

+1. let's do it :)

-- dims

On 1/31/06, Jeremy Boynes <jboynes@apache.org> wrote:
> Paul Fremantle wrote:
> > I think there is more benefit to this than just the WS-Policy.
> >
> > For example, AXIOM could be used by any of a number of projects that ne=
ed a
> > lazily-built tree. In Synapse, we use AXIOM extensively just to parse o=
ur
> > config. And also, although Synapse has a heavy dependency on Axis2, the=
 core
> > model of Synapse was built to only depend on AXIOM. So I think this is =
worth
> > doing now.
> >
> > It also seems to me that Axiom is pretty stable, which motivates it.
> >
> > But I agree, Dims, if that was the only reason, then it would be simple=
 to
> > fix. But the circular dependency is just an outcome of AXIOM getting wi=
der
> > usage as an XML model
> >
>
> Tuscany may also want to use AXIOM in an implementation of SDO2.
> Although the SCA implementation is migrating to Axis2, it would be
> better if the SDO part could just pick up AXIOM. It would help if it was
> available separately.
>
> --
> Jeremy
>
>


--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/