+1 for the proposal
But do we need to allow "Any XML junk" ? I mean string would be fine for a
description rather than XML
On 1/24/06, Ruchith Fernando <ruchith.fernando@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1 to the description element
>
> Thanks,
> Ruchith
>
> On 1/24/06, Chamikara Jayalath <chamikaramj@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1. Thats a nice feature.
> >
> > Chamikara
> >
> >
> > On 1/23/06, Deepal Jayasinghe <deepal@opensource.lk> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all;
> > >
> > > Module author should be able to tell small description about his
> module
> > implementation and currently we are not support that. As an example
> module
> > author should be able to tell about the spec that the module has
> implemented
> > and its version and etc.. , So I like to have decryption element in
> > module.xml (same as service decryption in services.xml) , when it come
> to
> > module versioning having decryptions is very useful.
> > >
> > > <description>
> > > Any XML junk or just string can go here
> > > </description>
> > >
> > > comments .....
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Deepal
> > >
> > ................................................................
> > > ~Future is Open~
> > >
> >
> >
>
--
Ajith Ranabahu
|