axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Srinath Perera <hemap...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Axis2] Configuration hierarchy no longer extends the WSDLComponents !
Date Tue, 06 Dec 2005 23:28:29 GMT
To add a litte thing, public AxisService(WSDLService service) is
wrong, as we have a choice of Endpoints at that point it should be

public AxisService(WSDLEndPoint wsdlendpoint), and I am start to think
that we should have public AxisServiceGroup(WSDLService service)

thoughts?
Srinath



On 12/6/05, Chathura Herath <chathurah@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
> > Sure :) ... how about because it was *never* used as the relevant WSDL
> > component? Other than that, there's a mismatch too .. we currently tag
> > AxisService as implementing WSDLService. But that's not really true - an
> > AxisService represents the entire service, not just the <service>
> > element.
> Its not an element, its a component and From WSDLService you can
> navigate to the operations.
>
> > OTOH AxisOperation may have info that may have come from both
> > portType/operation and binding/operation .. so its not a perfect match,
> True.
>
> It might not have been used for its fullest potential (i. e. the
> replaced by woden). But one other reason why we extend it is because
> it allows us to get rid of duplicate object trees. One at the WOM
> level and another at the configuration hierarchy level, and one tree
> is pointing to other from here and there.
> May be i am wrong but I still do not see extra advantage of this delegation.
>
> Chathura
>
> P.S.
> Anyway if there is no objection i would like to see the delegation
> happen at the interface level, rather than in implementation level. It
> makes things consistant.
> public AxisService(WSDLServiceImpl serviceImpl)
> -->
> public AxisService(WSDLService service)
>
>
>
> --
> Chathura Herath
> http://www.bloglines.com/blog/chathurah
>

Mime
View raw message