axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thilina Gunarathne <cset...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Axis2] Road Map for next release
Date Fri, 04 Nov 2005 20:11:34 GMT
Hi all,
I know this will light the flames again...
How about finalising the AxisFault issues for the next release... Support
for SOAP 1.2 fualts..
 Also ws-Addressing testing. Specially the final version..
 My two cents...
 Thanks,
~Thilina

 On 11/4/05, Tom Jordahl <tomj@macromedia.com> wrote:
>
>   I think it is a bit misleading to characterize what I am expecting as
> being **everything**. Axis 1.x doesn't even come close to everything. But
> it is still very useable.
>
>  What I would hope is that ADB can be used with a typical WSDL found in
> the wild – UDDI, Amazon.com <http://amazon.com/>, Google, etc, etc. If it
> doesn't work with the WSDL users are likely to want to consume, then they
> will just walk away. Or maybe they will figure out how to use XMLBeans.
> Maybe.
>
>  Just my 2 cents.
>
> --
>
> Tom Jordahl
>
>    ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Eran Chinthaka [mailto:chinthaka@opensource.lk]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 02, 2005 9:06 PM
> *To:* axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Axis2] Road Map for next release
>
>  One more comment.
>
> Can you all remember that we agreed to have a "Simple" data binding
> framework for Axis2, during the second Axis2 f2f ? We were very clear that
> we didn't want a full data binding tool. (Glen, Dims you all were there
> too.)
> So Tom, its unfair for you to expect *everything* from ADB. If you want
> full support use any of the existing data binding tools with Axis2. I think
> the existing stuff would be far better than Axis2 as they were built by
> domain experts.
> So do we need to re-invent the wheel here ?
>
>
>
>
> Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 14:56 -0500, Tom Jordahl wrote:
>
>
>
> If users are trying to use the data binding and it doesn't meet their
>
> needs, how can it be a slippery slope?
>
>
>
>
>
> Where would you draw the line Tom? Substitution groups? Attribute
>
> groups? Or would you not draw a line at all?
>
>
>
> If we do all of XML Schema then we are reinventing XMLBeans or something
>
> similar. That's clearly not the core competency of SOAP implementors; so
>
> would that be a core part of a SOAP implementation.
>
>
>
> I'm *really* hoping that Paul Downey's new WG [1] on schema patterns for
>
> data binding does something useful so that we can stop this debate and
>
> draw the line at that!
>
>
>
> Sanjiva.
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/xsdb/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


--
"May the SourcE be with u"
http://webservices.apache.org/~thilina/
http://thilinag.blogspot.com/ http://www.bloglines.com/blog/Thilina
Mime
View raw message