Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99914 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2005 00:29:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Sep 2005 00:29:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 14050 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2005 00:28:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 14027 invoked by uid 500); 11 Sep 2005 00:28:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-dev@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 14014 invoked by uid 99); 11 Sep 2005 00:28:48 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 17:28:48 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [66.163.169.227] (HELO smtp107.mail.sc5.yahoo.com) (66.163.169.227) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 17:28:59 -0700 Received: (qmail 42942 invoked from network); 11 Sep 2005 00:28:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.105?) (david?jencks@66.93.38.137 with plain) by smtp107.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Sep 2005 00:28:46 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) In-Reply-To: <57023d1305090903061af7198@mail.gmail.com> References: <57023d1305090903061af7198@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: David Jencks Subject: Re: [Axis2] Subtle yet serious issue Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 17:28:44 -0700 To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I'm not entirely sure what the problem you are running into is, but I=20 recall some discussion on the xmlbeans list about something that sounds=20= related to me. I think that in xbean-2.0.0.jar the classes involved=20 have been moved into an xmlbeans package from the javax.xml.soap=20 package. There are several other bug fixes in 2.0.0 that made it=20 usable in geronimo, so you may want to upgrade anyway. thanks david jencks On Sep 9, 2005, at 3:06 AM, jayachandra wrote: > Guys! > I've identified this with great hardship trying to run some saaj=20 > related test kit. > =A0 > The issue is, as a dependency for wsdl module (data binding) we are=20 > using xbean-2.0.0-beta1.jar. But **this jar has redefined=20 > javax.xml.soap package classes and the crucial of them=20 > SOAPMessageFactory.java, and SOAPFactory.java (abstract classes) are=20= > pointing to axis 1.x version implementation classes in their=20 > newInstance() methods** > So meaning, once the user deploys axis2 on tomcat, if this xbean jar=20= > comes first in his classpath, then all the saaj specific=20 > implementation would be referring to axis1.x implementation and not=20 > our Axis2 org.apache.axis2.saaj.* implementation. > =A0 > @Ajith! > Do we need javax.xml.soap. package bundled along=A0with xbean jar, in=20= > the first place. I don't know why xml beans was using saaj apis. If we=20= > seriously need them, can we tweak the jar such that the existing=20 > harded coded values like "=20 > org.apache.axis.soap.SOAPMessageFactoryImpl" be modified to=20 > "org.apache.axis2.saaj.SOAPMessageFactoryImpl" and rehost the jar at=20= > some alternate location. Or more better, we can build saaj prior to=20 > wsdl module and use axis2-saaj-${ pom.version}.jar along with the jar=20= > containing core xmlbeans classes. > =A0 > Thank you > Jayachandra > --=20 > -- Jaya=