Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 6269 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2005 19:42:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Sep 2005 19:42:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 5317 invoked by uid 500); 23 Sep 2005 19:42:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 5289 invoked by uid 500); 23 Sep 2005 19:42:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-dev@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 5260 invoked by uid 99); 23 Sep 2005 19:42:22 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 12:42:22 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [209.68.5.16] (HELO relay02.pair.com) (209.68.5.16) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 23 Sep 2005 12:42:28 -0700 Received: (qmail 55518 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2005 19:41:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 23 Sep 2005 19:41:57 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 64.171.54.121 Message-ID: <43345A79.5040605@opensource.lk> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 12:41:46 -0700 From: Eran Chinthaka Reply-To: chinthaka@opensource.lk User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: [Axis2] 1.0-alpha release References: <39A72E1EBF03EB44AACFD8036D1489F90156E4DE@p02exm01.macromedia.com> In-Reply-To: <39A72E1EBF03EB44AACFD8036D1489F90156E4DE@p02exm01.macromedia.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010904010305000400090408" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010904010305000400090408 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Do we need WSDL 2.0 support for 1.0 ? I'm just asking the consensus, please do not hammer me :-( . Tom Jordahl wrote: > I would say that any Axis2 1.0 would have to fully support WSDL 1.1 > and WSDL 2.0 generation (from Java) and consumption (to Java). I > don't think we are there yet, particularly on the WSDL 2.0 front. > > > > I would much rather release early/often with a .92, .93, .95, etc. > > -- > Tom Jordahl > Macromedia Server Development > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:* Ajith Ranabahu [mailto:ajith.ranabahu@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, September 23, 2005 1:43 PM > *To:* Sanjiva Weerawarana > *Cc:* axis-dev@ws.apache.org; chinthaka@opensource.lk > *Subject:* Re: [Axis2] 1.0-alpha release > > > > Hi, > Well perhaps I was too eccentric in saying 75% (actually it is a > rough number I picked without much thought and is not a reflection of > the actual amount of funtionality we need to add) but what I feel is > that there's room for functionality and improvements. > In my side I feel that pumps for WOM to WSDL 1.1/2.0 are important > components that should be included. I guess others will think of bits > of pieces that are justfiable to be included in the final version 1.0 > as well ? > > On 9/23/05, *Sanjiva Weerawarana* > wrote: > > On Fri, 2005-09-23 at 21:58 +0600, Ajith Ranabahu wrote: >> Hi all, >> Yep I'm sure the 'first impression' is very important but frankly I >> don't think this alpha release is going to be completed in >> functionality even though I do not expect a major architectural >> change. I can think of all sorts of minor imporvements / feature >> additions that needs to be done for the other upcoming releases and I >> would say alpha is 75% of the 1.0 as far as the functionality is >> concerned. > > What's the missing 25% of functionality?? Let's make a list of missing > features; if there's really 25% missing then we cannot do an alpha > release. > > Sanjiva. > > > > > -- > Ajith Ranabahu > --------------010904010305000400090408 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Do we need WSDL 2.0 support for 1.0 ? I'm just asking the consensus, please do not hammer me :-( .

Tom Jordahl wrote:

I would say that any Axis2 1.0 would have to fully support WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2.0 generation (from Java) and consumption (to Java).  I don’t think we are there yet, particularly on the WSDL 2.0 front.

 

I would much rather release early/often with a .92, .93, .95, etc.

--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia Server Development

From: Ajith Ranabahu [mailto:ajith.ranabahu@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 1:43 PM
To: Sanjiva Weerawarana
Cc: axis-dev@ws.apache.org; chinthaka@opensource.lk
Subject: Re: [Axis2] 1.0-alpha release

 

Hi,
Well perhaps I was too eccentric in saying  75% (actually it is a rough number I picked without much thought and is not a reflection of the actual amount of funtionality we need to add) but what I feel is that there's room for functionality and improvements.
In my side I feel that pumps for WOM to WSDL 1.1/2.0 are important components that should be included. I guess others will think of bits of pieces that are justfiable to be included in the final version 1.0 as well ?

On 9/23/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@opensource.lk> wrote:

On Fri, 2005-09-23 at 21:58 +0600, Ajith Ranabahu wrote:
> Hi all,
> Yep I'm sure the 'first impression' is very important but frankly I
> don't think this alpha release is going to be completed in
> functionality even though I do not expect a major architectural
> change. I can think of all sorts of minor imporvements / feature
> additions that needs to be done for the other upcoming releases and I
> would say alpha is 75% of the 1.0 as far as the functionality is
> concerned.

What's the missing 25% of functionality?? Let's make a list of missing
features; if there's really 25% missing then we cannot do an alpha
release.

Sanjiva.




--
Ajith Ranabahu

--------------010904010305000400090408--