axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Eran Chinthaka <chinth...@opensource.lk>
Subject Re: [Axis2] 1.0-alpha release
Date Fri, 23 Sep 2005 19:41:46 GMT
Do we need WSDL 2.0 support for 1.0 ? I'm just asking the consensus, 
please do not hammer me :-( .

Tom Jordahl wrote:

> I would say that any Axis2 1.0 would have to fully support WSDL 1.1 
> and WSDL 2.0 generation (from Java) and consumption (to Java).  I 
> don't think we are there yet, particularly on the WSDL 2.0 front.
>
>  
>
> I would much rather release early/often with a .92, .93, .95, etc.
>
> --
> Tom Jordahl
> Macromedia Server Development
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From:* Ajith Ranabahu [mailto:ajith.ranabahu@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, September 23, 2005 1:43 PM
> *To:* Sanjiva Weerawarana
> *Cc:* axis-dev@ws.apache.org; chinthaka@opensource.lk
> *Subject:* Re: [Axis2] 1.0-alpha release
>
>  
>
> Hi,
> Well perhaps I was too eccentric in saying  75% (actually it is a 
> rough number I picked without much thought and is not a reflection of 
> the actual amount of funtionality we need to add) but what I feel is 
> that there's room for functionality and improvements.
> In my side I feel that pumps for WOM to WSDL 1.1/2.0 are important 
> components that should be included. I guess others will think of bits 
> of pieces that are justfiable to be included in the final version 1.0 
> as well ?
>
> On 9/23/05, *Sanjiva Weerawarana* <sanjiva@opensource.lk 
> <mailto:sanjiva@opensource.lk>> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2005-09-23 at 21:58 +0600, Ajith Ranabahu wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Yep I'm sure the 'first impression' is very important but frankly I
>> don't think this alpha release is going to be completed in
>> functionality even though I do not expect a major architectural
>> change. I can think of all sorts of minor imporvements / feature
>> additions that needs to be done for the other upcoming releases and I
>> would say alpha is 75% of the 1.0 as far as the functionality is
>> concerned.
>
> What's the missing 25% of functionality?? Let's make a list of missing
> features; if there's really 25% missing then we cannot do an alpha
> release.
>
> Sanjiva.
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Ajith Ranabahu
>

Mime
View raw message