Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of davanum@gmail.com designates
 64.233.170.195 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=Nuuie6sUWFptH/DeXKJ+YUTJ5qLsXbBOhWtBimnjqELhe76AG7wqTmP33/2KEi2x5fYDbgoZ6WSyO4yqeavcXwkfYEYtZj/8RgWhC5qtTBH+UyFG2/Vnr6MttNamR+JPCV2j8J9gHNoE9yClFw1C0lY52i7UVZykEwYRJYI+pf0=
Message-ID: <19e0530f050824083337ff93f9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 11:33:30 -0400
From: Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com>
Reply-To: dims@apache.org
To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Axis2] Clarification needed on the Types section
In-Reply-To: <1124895582.6554.14.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <f43ea579050824050943c92f3@mail.gmail.com>
	 <57023d1305082405234bbcbaf@mail.gmail.com>
	 <19e0530f0508240552188a91bd@mail.gmail.com>
	 <f43ea579050824060240d2090c@mail.gmail.com>
	 <19e0530f05082406105df0e532@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1124895582.6554.14.camel@localhost.localdomain>

Sanjiva,

It's not some odd-ball wsdl from a clueless person. It's the WSRF wsdl
(see the email from Ajith -
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=3Daxis-dev&m=3D112488538126989&w=3D2)

I don't believe it is wrong!!!

thanks,
dims

On 8/24/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@opensource.lk> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 09:10 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > Ajith,
> >
> > In Axis 1.X and elsewhere, people default to wsdl's targetNamespace.
> > can't we do that instead?
>=20
> That's flat out wrong .. :(. Any normal schema process given a schema
> without a TNS (called chameleon schema IIRC) will consider the declared
> EIIs and AIIs as not being qualified. If they are not qualified it is
> impossible to refer to them from WSDL. Hence its illegal.
>=20
> Ajith, can you send your question to the WSDL WG mailing list? There are
> several serious XSD wonks there and we can get the definitive answer
> there.
>=20
> Sanjiva.
>=20
>=20
>=20


--=20
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/ - Oxygenating The Web Service Platform