axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Srinath Perera <hemap...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [jira] Updated: (AXIS2-109) Databinding completeness in the stubs that are generated
Date Thu, 04 Aug 2005 12:41:35 GMT
Hi Tom;

I make it minor due to 2 reasons

1) It is to be handled after the 0.95 (we say we need to fix all that
is major for 0.95 so that the major is relative! )
2) I understood the bug to mean "we need a make the client stub not
have xml beans specific things", have I misunderstood it?

Thanks
Srinath



On 8/4/05, Tom Jordahl <tomj@macromedia.com> wrote:
> 
> I really don't agree that support for wrapped services is Minor....
> 
> 
> Tom Jordahl
> Macromedia Server Development
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Srinath Perera (JIRA) [mailto:jira@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 9:14 PM
> To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> Subject: [jira] Updated: (AXIS2-109) Databinding completeness in the
> stubs that are generated
> 
>      [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-109?page=all ]
> 
> Srinath Perera updated AXIS2-109:
> ---------------------------------
> 
>     Priority: Minor  (was: Major)
> 
> post 0.95
> 
> > Databinding completeness in the stubs that are generated
> > --------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >          Key: AXIS2-109
> >          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-109
> >      Project: Apache Axis 2.0 (Axis2)
> >         Type: Improvement
> >   Components: databinding
> >     Reporter: Jayachandra Sekhara Rao Sunkara
> >     Priority: Minor
> >  Attachments: SimpleTest.wsdl
> >
> > We should project stub methods tha are completely agnostic of the
> databinding mechanism utilized to generate them.
> > FYI, I'm copy pasting the issue that was mailed to axis-dev on 28th
> July 2005
> > *** Transcript of the mail follows ***
> > Hi there,
> > I planned to test a stub based style of invocation with this wsdl
> [attached below- SimpleTest.wsdl].
> > Its the wsdl for a webservice which hosts a method of the signature
> public String echoString(String inputString); I started with wsdl2java
> to generate stubs for me. I then set out to write a test client (this
> was lacking from wsdl2java artifacts that got generated) that would just
> assume as if it was invoking a local method named echoString on the
> stub. Strangely the method signature of
> > echoString(..) in the generated stub is seen to expect an XMLBeans
> specific EchoStringDocument kind of object as its input parameter.
> > This makes us think that data binding is not facilitated to the user
> fully. User shouldn't have to bore the onus of creating an
> EchoStringDocument object and pass it as parameter to the stub method,
> at least when he is using the stub based invocation, isn't it? Is this
> feature on our wish list or am I missing something!?!
> > Thank you
> > Jayachandra
> 
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
>    http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
> -
> For more information on JIRA, see:
>    http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
> 
>

Mime
View raw message