Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of hemapani@gmail.com designates
 64.233.184.193 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=OS4PSbzLdpMeetDIScCpZdFovBIR721yoXw4F7gX4JpSdVu+B5AhTz1sZxM2NIPnqyiZsY7XPEcX1qP/kwNKrTex01rKvNlzdosIsBmnujXaEKSSbuML6x/J566PYk6KSuwJL7/COF2l4hi67rbRwZG5xvf2/JklbxXy+MEb980=
Message-ID: <f8de7ee050714183627f702df@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 07:36:14 +0600
From: Srinath Perera <hemapani@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Srinath Perera <hemapani@gmail.com>
To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Axis2] Fault in handling values in addressing parameters
In-Reply-To: <1121354866.22275.45.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20050714092524.7D2EC10FB2B2@asf.osuosl.org>
	 <1121354866.22275.45.camel@localhost.localdomain>

+1 to use a efficient our URI class .. I think rather than do it in
the out handler we should change the signatures of our methods to
accept our URI and do the check in the URI constructor.

Thanks
Srinath

On 7/14/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@opensource.lk> wrote:
> +1 for checking in the out handler but I also think parsing those
> strings as URIs is waaay overkill. Maybe a small "parser" to check that
> the strings have a scheme would be sufficient.
>=20
> Sanjiva.
>=20
> On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 03:26 +0530, Eran Chinthaka wrote:
> > This was done intentionally as some people suggested me that java URI
> > handling is very slow. So I put String for them purposely.
> >
> > But as you proposed we can do a check on these values in
> > AddressingOutHandler.
> >
> > What abt others think on this ....
> >
> > Regards,
> > Chinthaka
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Srinath Perera [mailto:hemapani@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 2:44 PM
> > > To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> > > Subject: [Axis2] Fault in handling values in addressing parameters
> > >
> > > Hi All;
> > >
> > > Most values (messageID,Action, address in a EPR ) in the Adressing is
> > > typed as URI in the Spec but our implementation and the dispatching
> > > treats them as string.
> > >
> > > This relaxation aollow our Axis2 to send wrong Addressing headers
> > > e.g.
> > > <wsa:MessageID> 11234 </wsa:MessageID>
> > >
> > > I belive we should check for and reject the non URI values that are
> > > set, Shall I add a JIRA issue?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Srinath
> >
> >
> >
> >
>=20
>