axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thilina Gunarathne <cset...@gmail.com>
Subject Fwd: [axis2] Re: Dealing with MTOM veto
Date Wed, 20 Jul 2005 02:45:53 GMT
Sending to the group.... done a mistake with reply @....

Hi,
That Cid thing was handled well and in a spec compliant way in earlier
code :).........When i said CID processing it included "<>" +
stringping off cid too.
I have a fixed version with me now. Thinking whether to commit or not...

I'm really sorry for my very slow responsiveness these days. I have to
submit a huge report to the campus by end of next week + Kandula
rearchitecting in my head... I'll try to catch the things up as soon
as possible....

Regards,
~Thilina

On 7/19/05, Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com> wrote:
> the code in question will strip the '<' and '>'  from content-id in
> the mime part and then add it to the internal collection of parts.
>
> Question is IF the '<'/'>' is absent then should we throw an error or not.
>
> Thilina,
> BTW, i saw another problem. if i see the whitemesa traces
> (http://www.whitemesa.net/mtom-cr-traces/mtom-cr-2a-resp.txt)
>
> in the xml part they use:
> <xop:Include href="cid:uuid:3C689526-B778-4059-B0C6-0D01120167B8" />
>
> and in the mimepart they use:
> Content-Id: <uuid:3C689526-B778-4059-B0C6-0D01120167B8>
>
> note that cid: is not present in the mimepart. according to the RFC,
> is this incorrect?
>
> -- dims
>
> On 7/19/05, Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Let him at least write the code and then you can -1 it. what's gotten
> > into you? :)
> >
> > -- dims
> >
> > On 7/19/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@opensource.lk> wrote:
> > > An ENTIRE line of bug-compatible code?? Oh my god, how terrible! Hell
> > > no, definite -1 on that one!!!!
> > >
> > > Sanjiva.
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 10:31 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > > > it's a one line change!!!
> > > >
> > > > On 7/19/05, Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@opensource.lk> wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 07:44 -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > > > > > Can we do this? let's try to be accomodating to what we accept
(means
> > > > > > accept messages with or without '<' and '>') but generate
messages
> > > > > > according to the RFC? At least till we get confirmation from
the folks
> > > > > > researching the problem?
> > > > >
> > > > > Um .. temporary bug compat mode? I'd rather just let it be until
we get
> > > > > feedback from the MSFT guys .. I'm sure they'll report back soon
saying
> > > > > "yes its a bug we'll fix it" and then we can do the right thing.
Once
> > > > > you start putting these "conveniences" it becomes hard to remove
'em ..
> > > > >
> > > > > Sanjiva.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Davanum Srinivas -http://blogs.cocoondev.org/dims/
> >
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas -http://blogs.cocoondev.org/dims/
>


--
"May the SourcE be with u"
http://www.bloglines.com/blog/thilina


-- 
"May the SourcE be with u" 
http://www.bloglines.com/blog/thilina

Mime
View raw message