Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 1673 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2004 13:16:42 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2004 13:16:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 22217 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2004 13:16:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 22194 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2004 13:16:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-dev@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 22185 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2004 13:16:35 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [192.18.33.10] (HELO exchange.sun.com) (192.18.33.10) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Wed, 03 Nov 2004 05:16:34 -0800 Received: (qmail 6952 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2004 13:16:33 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO nagoya) (127.0.0.1) by nagoya.betaversion.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2004 13:16:33 -0000 Message-ID: <293523744.1099487793540.JavaMail.apache@nagoya> Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 05:16:33 -0800 (PST) From: "Davanum Srinivas (JIRA)" To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (AXIS-1638) Service.createCall(QName, QName) ignores the operationName's namespace In-Reply-To: <1540694931.1099439552367.JavaMail.apache@nagoya> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N [ http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1638?page=comments#action_54973 ] Davanum Srinivas commented on AXIS-1638: ---------------------------------------- How do you propose we change the code? (patch appreciated) thanks, dims > Service.createCall(QName, QName) ignores the operationName's namespace > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: AXIS-1638 > URL: http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1638 > Project: Axis > Type: Bug > Components: Basic Architecture > Versions: 1.2RC1 > Reporter: Chelliah Thirunavukkarasu > Priority: Minor > > Service.createCall(QName portName, QName operationQName) > turns around and calls the Call.setOperationName(String operationName) method > instead of Call.setOperationName(QName operationName) > 'cos of the namespace of the operation is lost and when the call is invoked, an empty namespace URI is used. > The workaround is to call Call.setOperationName() after creating the call object. > Related to this: > When Service.createCall(QName portName, String operationName) is used by the caller, > should axis use the namespace from the portName as the namespace for the operation? > Or should it do the following: > If operation has a namespace use it. Else, attempt to use port type's namespace. If port type is > not specified, use port's namespace? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira