axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Davanum Srinivas (JIRA)" <axis-...@ws.apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (AXIS-1638) Service.createCall(QName, QName) ignores the operationName's namespace
Date Wed, 03 Nov 2004 13:16:33 GMT
     [ http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1638?page=comments#action_54973 ]
     
Davanum Srinivas commented on AXIS-1638:
----------------------------------------

How do you propose we change the code? (patch appreciated)

thanks,
dims

> Service.createCall(QName, QName) ignores the operationName's namespace
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: AXIS-1638
>          URL: http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1638
>      Project: Axis
>         Type: Bug
>   Components: Basic Architecture
>     Versions: 1.2RC1
>     Reporter: Chelliah Thirunavukkarasu
>     Priority: Minor

>
> Service.createCall(QName portName, QName operationQName)
> turns around and calls the Call.setOperationName(String operationName) method
> instead of Call.setOperationName(QName operationName)
> 'cos of the namespace of the operation is lost and when the call is invoked, an empty
namespace URI is used.
> The workaround is to call Call.setOperationName() after creating the call object.
> Related to this:
> When Service.createCall(QName portName, String operationName) is used by the caller,
> should axis use the namespace from the portName as the namespace for the operation?
> Or should it do the following:
> If operation has a namespace use it. Else, attempt to use port type's namespace. If port
type is
> not specified, use port's namespace?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Mime
View raw message