axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Axis version
Date Tue, 24 Aug 2004 05:14:46 GMT
Guess what all the soap engine vendors are going to do if we do that?
Every single vendor already has voluminous whitepapers and ppt's
comparing their thingy to axis releases and use that to create FUD in
the market. users can still use the named releases...right?

-- dims

On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 21:47:46 -0500, Aleksander Slominski
<aslom@cs.indiana.edu> wrote:
> Dims,
> 
> if none of performance problems are showstoppers (are there any?) then
> why not release what is currently in CVS (after freeze period and
> release testing) and then do performance tuning with subsequent 1.2.x
> releases?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> alek
> 
> 
> 
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> 
> >There are some performance issues that need to be found and fixed
> >before we can declare 1.2 as final. It may take a month or two
> >(hopefully). Of course, we can do it sooner if we get some good
> >patches. See http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=axis-dev&m=109271477419756&w=2
> >for a list of suggestions from Nishant. I wish we could get a few
> >patches from Nishant :) :)
> >
> >-- dims
> >
> >On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 10:28:53 +0300, Arkady Kasianski <arikka@amdocs.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>1.1 was released june 2003. When 1.2 will be released!
> >>
> >>Davanum, Could you answer please ?
> >>
> >>Lael Beta expels our customers....
> >>
> >>-AK
> >>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Will Sargent [mailto:will_sargent@yahoo.com]
> >>Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2004 8:55 PM
> >>To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
> >>Subject: Re: Axis version
> >>
> >>Nelson Minar wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>>We are using Axis 1.2 beta 2 in our big Web services project. Our
> >>>>product management insist to use GA 1.1 release, since using beta
> >>>>product in the production environment is unacceptable.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>This is a bad decision - 1.2 is much, much better than 1.1. If I had
> >>>recalcitrant PMs, I'd just tell them that 1.1 was lower quality than
> >>>the current 1.2beta and that it'd be too hard to port your code back
> >>>to 1.1 anyway.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>But this doesn't say anything about 1.2.  Is 1.2 "good enough" quality
> >>to use in a production environment?  Especially when it has the beta
> >>label on it?
> >>
> >>Quite frankly, I've given up on using Axis altogether, and I'm using
> >>SAAJ.  It's way lower-level, but it's well documented and stable, and I
> >>can build the features I need myself in much less time than it would
> >>take me to work around the bugs in Axis and figure out what it's doing.
> >>
> >>Will.
> >>
> >>The information contained in this message is proprietary of Amdocs,
> >>protected from disclosure, and may be privileged.
> >>The information is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s)
> >>of the message. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,
> >>you are hereby notified that any dissemination, use, distribution or copying
of
> >>this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
> >>If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
> >>by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
> >>Thank you.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> -- 
> The best way to predict the future is to invent it - Alan Kay
> 
> 


-- 
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/

Mime
View raw message