Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: SAAJ 1.2, JAX-RPC 1.1, WS-I BP qualifies for a Axis 2.0 label?
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 15:19:07 -0400
Message-ID: <BB19FB6E27A03443802183580F6E87950613F5@usmail3k3.us.Micros.int>
Thread-Topic: SAAJ 1.2, JAX-RPC 1.1, WS-I BP qualifies for a Axis 2.0 label?
Thread-Index: AcRgaSTYXF3JQztnQpeLaQXTbzCkxgAAAeXg
From: "Kellogg, Richard" <RKellogg@MICROS.COM>
To: <axis-dev@ws.apache.org>

Dims,

I agree the changes warrant a version number change.  Will we confuse =
people by releasing a 1.2 Beta and a 2.0 Final release?  What is the =
precedent in the Jakarta project?  Just my two cents.

Rick Kellogg

-----Original Message-----
From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:davanum@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 3:03 PM
To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: SAAJ 1.2, JAX-RPC 1.1, WS-I BP qualifies for a Axis 2.0
label?


glen, tom,

thoughts?=20

-- dims

On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 22:58:55 +0600, Sanjiva Weerawarana
<sanjiva@opensource.lk> wrote:
> I don't think this is a good idea .. the changes are incremental
> changes and not radical. I personal prefer to make major version
> changes when there's more than incremental changes.
>=20
> I do agree its good to be ahead of the Axis/C++ version #s ..
> but they're on a much faster release cycle. Part of it of course
> is because Axis/Java 1.0 was not a 1.0 like Axis/C++ was .. it had
> the benefit of a prior impl (Apache SOAP) .. so we really should've
> started with Axis/Java 3.0. However, since we started with 1.0, this
> seems like the wrong time to jump ship to 2.0.
>=20
> I'm -0 on this.
>=20
> Sanjiva.
> p.s.: We're not (and no one is) WSDL 2.0 supportive yet of course.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Loughran" <stevel@apache.org>
> To: <axis-dev@ws.apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 10:39 PM
> Subject: Re: SAAJ 1.2, JAX-RPC 1.1, WS-I BP qualifies for a Axis 2.0 =
label?
>=20
> > Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > > Glen, Tom, Ias, Steve, others,
> > >
> > > Since we are certifying against SAAJ 1.2 and JAX-RPC 1.1 and since
> > > JAX-RPC 1.1 implies conformance to WS-I BP. This is major stuff =
going
> > > on :) I also want to be ahead of the Axis C++ version #'s as well =
:)
> > > :)
> > >
> > > So, shall we up the label to 2.0? and release an updated beta next =
week?
> >
> > Seems good to me. There has been a lot of change from 1.1. And given
> > WSDL1.1 went to to 2.0, we can only be compatible :)
> >
>=20
>=20


--=20
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/