Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 97002 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2004 02:59:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2004 02:59:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 77587 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2004 02:59:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 77568 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2004 02:59:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-dev@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 77558 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2004 02:59:54 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [192.77.186.1] (HELO pscgate.progress.com) (192.77.186.1) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 19:59:53 -0700 Received: from elvirus.progress.com (elvirus [192.77.186.100]) by pscgate.progress.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/PSC-5.11) with ESMTP id i6H2xcOQ013628; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 22:59:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from progress.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elvirus.progress.com (8.10.2/8.10.2/PSC-4.01) with ESMTP id i6H2xbp24756; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 22:59:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from NTEXFE02.bedford.progress.com (ntexfe02 [172.16.2.62]) by progress.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i6H2xbv21278; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 22:59:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from MAIL01.bedford.progress.com ([172.16.2.55]) by NTEXFE02.bedford.progress.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Fri, 16 Jul 2004 22:59:37 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: AXIS-1423 : Peter's test case for performance Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 22:59:35 -0400 Message-ID: <80A43FC052CE3949A327527DCD5D6B2758B1D6@MAIL01.bedford.progress.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: AXIS-1423 : Peter's test case for performance Thread-Index: AcRrqdHvnwzAS8aWR9K3QH7PSZHYvAAADFIg From: "Glen Daniels" To: , "Peter Molettiere" Cc: "Tom Jordahl" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Jul 2004 02:59:37.0948 (UTC) FILETIME=[18E4D9C0:01C46BAA] X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Me too :) I just got home and had left an OptimizeIt session running before I left, so will take a look soon. --G=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:davanum@gmail.com]=20 > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 10:58 PM > To: Peter Molettiere > Cc: Tom Jordahl; dims@apache.org; axis-dev@ws.apache.org; Glen Daniels > Subject: Re: AXIS-1423 : Peter's test case for performance >=20 > am still looking :) >=20 > -- dims >=20 > On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 18:57:33 -0700, Peter Molettiere=20 > wrote: > >=20 > > I'll do what I can, although I'm certainly a bit hampered by not=20 > > having spent lots of time with the axis source. Someone who really=20 > > understands the axis internals would probably be able to find this=20 > > much more quickly than I can. > >=20 > > If you'd like, I'm not far from Macromedia. You're welcome=20 > to come by=20 > > and take a look at what I'm doing. Maybe two heads can come=20 > up with a=20 > > solution where one can't. > >=20 > > --Peter > >=20 > >=20 > >=20 > > On Jul 16, 2004, at 11:36 AM, Tom Jordahl wrote: > >=20 > > > > > > Peter, > > > > > > This is really good work. It seems like you really have=20 > a handle on=20 > > > how to reproduce this problem. > > > > > > Do you have any tools that you could bring to bear on *where* the=20 > > > memory leak is in the code? It sure sounds like you are just a=20 > > > single step away from finding the leak. > > > > > > -- > > > Tom Jordahl > > > Macromedia Server Development > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Peter Molettiere [mailto:pietro@axonstudios.net] > > > Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 2:27 PM > > > To: dims@apache.org > > > Cc: axis-dev@ws.apache.org; Glen Daniels > > > Subject: Re: AXIS-1423 : Peter's test case for performance > > > > > > > > > Hey guys, > > > > > > We set the numbers high to make the problem manifest easily,=20 > > > however, if you set the return message size smaller, you'll still=20 > > > see the server side memory leak, it will just take much longer to=20 > > > notice, since you have to leak much more memory before the=20 > > > serialization/deserialization overhead (which is itself=20 > much smaller=20 > > > due to the smaller message size) bumps into the max heap=20 > size limit. > > > > > > We're mainly concerned with the server leaking memory,=20 > rather than=20 > > > the large amount of memory used during=20 > > > serialization/deserialization, since it eventually crashes our=20 > > > server, whereas we can just install more RAM and increase=20 > our heap=20 > > > size to get around the gobs of memory used during serialization. > > > > > > --Peter > > > > > > On Jul 16, 2004, at 9:26 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > > > > >> Glen, > > >> > > >> Uploaded a slightly revved version of Peter's test case.=20 > Note that=20 > > >> there are 15 threads each issuing 50 calls against a=20 > service that=20 > > >> delivers a 13 MB XML (Please edit the client code to=20 > restore the=20 > > >> original params if needed) > > >> > > >> http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1423 > > >> > > >> -- dims > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ > >=20 > >=20 >=20 >=20 > -- > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ >=20 >=20