Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Message-ID: <40E5C531.504@essex.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 21:27:29 +0100
From: Richard Martin <rmarti@essex.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: SAAJ 1.2, JAX-RPC 1.1, WS-I BP qualifies for a Axis 2.0 label?
References: <19e0530f040702075868457c4b@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <19e0530f040702075868457c4b@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Where does this leave the axis2 source branch ( I note that the branches 
from there down are empty, but the attic contains stuff - has this been 
moved? )

Other than that I'm all for it - these are important yardsticks. +1 
(even though I realise that it doesnt count from me)

Regards,

Richard

Davanum Srinivas wrote:

>Glen, Tom, Ias, Steve, others,
>
>Since we are certifying against SAAJ 1.2 and JAX-RPC 1.1 and since
>JAX-RPC 1.1 implies conformance to WS-I BP. This is major stuff going
>on :) I also want to be ahead of the Axis C++ version #'s as well :)
>:)
>
>So, shall we up the label to 2.0? and release an updated beta next week?
>
>Thanks,
>dims
>
>PS: Am re-running the SAAJ and JAX-RPC TCK's. We are getting close,
>especially with Ias'
>s checkins this morning :)
>
>  
>