Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Message-ID: <19e0530f04070814294ff887a9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 17:29:00 -0400
From: Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com>
Reply-To: dims@apache.org
To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Good to GO!!!
Cc: tomj@macromedia.com, axis-tck@ws.apache.org, dims@apache.org
In-Reply-To: <1089321715.29492.TMDA@eero>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <1089321715.29492.TMDA@eero>

Glen,

Do you have a problem with just the "call.getOutputParams()"
situation? i don't see any others that expose RPCParam....

thanks,
dims

On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 17:21:49 -0400, Glen Daniels <glen@thoughtcraft.com> wrote:
> 
> OK, so dims, I'm going to -1 this change for this release... can you back it out please?  I'm really sorry, but I think this is too
> big a hit for our users to take.  If we really need to support the SAAJ API all the way down through RPCElements, then we'll have to
> do it by creating child MessageElements and keeping them in sync with the RPCParams, at least for now....
> 
> --Glen
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Eric.D.Friedman@wellsfargo.com
> > [mailto:Eric.D.Friedman@wellsfargo.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 12:19 PM
> > To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org; tomj@macromedia.com;
> > axis-tck@ws.apache.org
> > Cc: dims@apache.org
> > Subject: RE: Good to GO!!!
> >
> > Agreed, I've written code that works around the current
> > (incorrect) behavior.  This is one of those pay me now/ pay
> > me later choices -- either way, you have to pay.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Glen Daniels [mailto:gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 7:43 AM
> > > To: Tom Jordahl; axis-tck@ws.apache.org
> > > Cc: dims@apache.org; axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> > > Subject: RE: Good to GO!!!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > call.getOutputParams(), among other places.  Pretty
> > critical, I'd say.
> > >
> > > --Glen
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Tom Jordahl [mailto:tomj@macromedia.com]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 10:39 AM
> > > > To: 'axis-tck@ws.apache.org'; Glen Daniels
> > > > Cc: 'dims@apache.org'; 'axis-dev@ws.apache.org'
> > > > Subject: RE: Good to GO!!!
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Do we think that the RPCParam API is public enough to be used by
> > > > users?
> > > >
> > > > Is it in the list of classes we promised not too muck with (do we
> > > > actually have that list? I know we wanted to have one)?
> > > >
> > > > Clearly our tests use it, but what is the use case for Axis users?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Tom Jordahl
> > > > Macromedia Server Development
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:davanum@gmail.com]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 10:33 AM
> > > > To: Glen Daniels
> > > > Cc: dims@apache.org; axis-tck@ws.apache.org;
> > axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: Good to GO!!!
> > > >
> > > > Glen,
> > > >
> > > > That's why i am making this change now rather than later....if we
> > > > get lot of feedback from users, then we will have to back it out
> > > > somehow.
> > > >
> > > > -- dims
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 10:30:21 -0400, Glen Daniels
> > > > <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Sweet!  Thanks for the hard work dims!
> > > > >
> > > > > One question about the RPCParam change, though - if I'm
> > > reading it
> > > > > right, the getValue() call on RPCParam now returns the text
> > > > value as
> > > > > per the SAAJ API, and the getObjectValue() is used to get
> > > > the actual
> > > > > value object.  This seems REALLY bad to me, in that there
> > > > might be a
> > > > > lot of preexisting code which will simply break when
> > this change
> > > > > occurs, and not in a very clean/easy-to-understand way
> > > either.  I'm
> > > > > pretty tempted to -1 this... what do others think?  If
> > > > we're going to
> > > > > make a change like this, it seems to me that we should at
> > > > least give
> > > > > one release's worth of warning to developers.....
> > > > >
> > > > > --Glen
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:davanum@gmail.com]
> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 10:17 AM
> > > > > > To: axis-tck@ws.apache.org; axis-dev@ws.apache.org;
> > > Glen Daniels;
> > > > > > Glen Daniels
> > > > > > Subject: Good to GO!!!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Glen,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ran both TCK's this morning....We're good to go for the
> > > > beta release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > dims
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> 


-- 
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/