axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Eric.D.Fried...@wellsfargo.com
Subject RE: Good to GO!!!
Date Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:18:45 GMT
Agreed, I've written code that works around the current (incorrect)
behavior.  This is one of those pay me now/ pay me later choices -- either
way, you have to pay.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glen Daniels [mailto:gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 7:43 AM
> To: Tom Jordahl; axis-tck@ws.apache.org
> Cc: dims@apache.org; axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Good to GO!!!
> 
> 
> 
> call.getOutputParams(), among other places.  Pretty critical, I'd say.
> 
> --Glen 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tom Jordahl [mailto:tomj@macromedia.com] 
> > Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 10:39 AM
> > To: 'axis-tck@ws.apache.org'; Glen Daniels
> > Cc: 'dims@apache.org'; 'axis-dev@ws.apache.org'
> > Subject: RE: Good to GO!!!
> > 
> > 
> > Do we think that the RPCParam API is public enough to be used 
> > by users?
> > 
> > Is it in the list of classes we promised not too muck with 
> > (do we actually have that list? I know we wanted to have one)?
> > 
> > Clearly our tests use it, but what is the use case for Axis users?
> > 
> > --
> > Tom Jordahl
> > Macromedia Server Development
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:davanum@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 10:33 AM
> > To: Glen Daniels
> > Cc: dims@apache.org; axis-tck@ws.apache.org; axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Good to GO!!!
> > 
> > Glen,
> > 
> > That's why i am making this change now rather than 
> > later....if we get lot of feedback from users, then we will 
> > have to back it out somehow.
> > 
> > -- dims
> > 
> > On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 10:30:21 -0400, Glen Daniels 
> > <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > Sweet!  Thanks for the hard work dims!
> > > 
> > > One question about the RPCParam change, though - if I'm 
> reading it 
> > > right, the getValue() call on RPCParam now returns the text 
> > value as 
> > > per the SAAJ API, and the getObjectValue() is used to get 
> > the actual 
> > > value object.  This seems REALLY bad to me, in that there 
> > might be a 
> > > lot of preexisting code which will simply break when this change 
> > > occurs, and not in a very clean/easy-to-understand way 
> either.  I'm 
> > > pretty tempted to -1 this... what do others think?  If 
> > we're going to 
> > > make a change like this, it seems to me that we should at 
> > least give 
> > > one release's worth of warning to developers.....
> > > 
> > > --Glen
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:davanum@gmail.com]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 10:17 AM
> > > > To: axis-tck@ws.apache.org; axis-dev@ws.apache.org; 
> Glen Daniels; 
> > > > Glen Daniels
> > > > Subject: Good to GO!!!
> > > >
> > > > Glen,
> > > >
> > > > Ran both TCK's this morning....We're good to go for the 
> > beta release.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > dims
> > > > --
> > > > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
> > 
> > 
> 

Mime
View raw message