axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tom Jordahl <t...@macromedia.com>
Subject RE: SAAJ 1.2, JAX-RPC 1.1, WS-I BP qualifies for a Axis 2.0 label ?
Date Tue, 06 Jul 2004 15:42:49 GMT
Sorry for the late reply, long holiday weekend.

I am inclined to stick with Axis 1.2, particularly since JAX-RPC is going to
have a 2.0 version (isn't it?).  We can move our number to sync with that
major change.

I don't think we want to scare people in to thinking we have changed
everything enough to call it 2.0.


--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia Server Development

-----Original Message-----
From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:davanum@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 3:03 PM
To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: SAAJ 1.2, JAX-RPC 1.1, WS-I BP qualifies for a Axis 2.0 label?

glen, tom,

thoughts? 

-- dims

On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 22:58:55 +0600, Sanjiva Weerawarana
<sanjiva@opensource.lk> wrote:
> I don't think this is a good idea .. the changes are incremental
> changes and not radical. I personal prefer to make major version
> changes when there's more than incremental changes.
> 
> I do agree its good to be ahead of the Axis/C++ version #s ..
> but they're on a much faster release cycle. Part of it of course
> is because Axis/Java 1.0 was not a 1.0 like Axis/C++ was .. it had
> the benefit of a prior impl (Apache SOAP) .. so we really should've
> started with Axis/Java 3.0. However, since we started with 1.0, this
> seems like the wrong time to jump ship to 2.0.
> 
> I'm -0 on this.
> 
> Sanjiva.
> p.s.: We're not (and no one is) WSDL 2.0 supportive yet of course.
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Loughran" <stevel@apache.org>
> To: <axis-dev@ws.apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 10:39 PM
> Subject: Re: SAAJ 1.2, JAX-RPC 1.1, WS-I BP qualifies for a Axis 2.0
label?
> 
> > Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > > Glen, Tom, Ias, Steve, others,
> > >
> > > Since we are certifying against SAAJ 1.2 and JAX-RPC 1.1 and since
> > > JAX-RPC 1.1 implies conformance to WS-I BP. This is major stuff going
> > > on :) I also want to be ahead of the Axis C++ version #'s as well :)
> > > :)
> > >
> > > So, shall we up the label to 2.0? and release an updated beta next
week?
> >
> > Seems good to me. There has been a lot of change from 1.1. And given
> > WSDL1.1 went to to 2.0, we can only be compatible :)
> >
> 
> 


-- 
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/

Mime
View raw message