axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
Subject [jira] Reopened: (AXIS-1259) local xsd:group constructs are not processed properly
Date Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:53:58 GMT

   The following issue has been reopened.

   Reopener: Davanum Srinivas
       Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:52 AM

well....can you please give me a sample xml for the foobartype complexType?
View the issue:

Here is an overview of the issue:
        Key: AXIS-1259
    Summary: local xsd:group constructs are not processed properly
       Type: Bug

     Status: Reopened
   Priority: Major

    Project: Axis
             WSDL processing
   Fix Fors:
             current (nightly)
             current (nightly)

   Assignee: Davanum Srinivas
   Reporter: Dominic Battre

    Created: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 5:07 AM
    Updated: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:52 AM
Environment: Gentoo Linux, Blackdown JDK 1.4.1

The fix for seems to create some problems
concerning xsd:groups.

At least WSDL2Java (cvs as of Feb 5 2004) processes the following code without complains whilst
WSDL2Java (cvs as of Feb 6 2004) produces this exception:

java org.apache.axis.wsdl.WSDL2Java --server-side --skeletonDeploy true --verbose test.wsdl

Parsing XML file:  test.wsdl Type {}simpleRestrictionModel is referenced
but not defined.
        at org.apache.axis.wsdl.symbolTable.SymbolTable.checkForUndefined(
        at org.apache.axis.wsdl.symbolTable.SymbolTable.add(
        at org.apache.axis.wsdl.symbolTable.SymbolTable.populate(
        at org.apache.axis.wsdl.symbolTable.SymbolTable.populate(
        at org.apache.axis.wsdl.gen.Parser$

The wsdl code creating the problem is

 <xsd:complexType name="foobartype">
       <xsd:group ref="xsd:simpleRestrictionModel" minOccurs="0"/>

I will attach the whole wsdl file and the patch that was applied on Feb 6 2004.

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.

If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:

If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:

View raw message