Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 15148 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2003 05:14:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-dev@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 14913 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2003 05:13:24 -0000 From: "Roshan Weerasuriya" To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: RE: C++ commits Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:04:58 +0600 Message-Id: <20030729045537.M56054@opensource.lk> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.00 20030424 X-OriginatingIP: 192.248.17.195 (roshan@opensource.lk) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N hi tom, I agree with you. Sorry for that. The reason is that when I try to commit around more than 2/3 files (a bunch of files) in a single commit I regularly get a CVS error. ----- error msg: cvs [commit aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any) ----- The error doesn't appear when the no of files at a single commit is less (around 2 files). So I had no option other than making several commits. Roshan On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 10:11:17 -0400, Tom Jordahl wrote > For instance (not to pick on just you roshan): > > "after introducing new Serializer interfaces IWrapperSoapSerializer > and IHandlerSoapSerializer" > > was submitted in about 8+ commits. > > 1 would be better. > > -- > Tom Jordahl > Macromedia Server Development > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Jordahl [mailto:tomj@macromedia.com] > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 10:05 AM > To: 'axis-dev@ws.apache.org' > Subject: RE: C++ commits > > Sanjiva, > > What (I thought) I was seeing was *related* file changes, many times > with the same check in comment, being done in individual submits. > This is what I was hoping to get clumped in to a single check-in. > > I have no problem with individual changes having different commits, > but at this early stage of the C++ project, it just seems that if > user X has a bunch of files to check in, they might as well do it > all together and detail what they did in a comprehensive comment. > > -- > Tom Jordahl > Macromedia Server Development > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 11:13 PM > To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org > Subject: Re: C++ commits > > IMHO its better to have separate commits .. its easier for someone > to monitor the commits ;-). How would you like if Dims kept doing > monster commits? > > Maybe its time to create axis-dev-c and axis-dev-j lists? Personally > I'd rather keep the family together yet, but if its bothering people > then we need to do something. Tom, would an additional mail filter > solve the immediate problem for you? > > Sanjiva. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tom Jordahl" > To: > Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 9:10 PM > Subject: C++ commits > > > > > It would be super cool if you all could combine the (related) C++ code > submissions in to a single commit. This make it easier for people to > either review (or not) your checkins. > > > > Sometimes its scary to see 50 unread messages in axis-dev. :-) > > > > Thanks! > > -- > > Tom Jordahl > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: susantha@apache.org [mailto:susantha@apache.org] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 11:52 PM > > To: xml-axis-cvs@apache.org > > Subject: cvs commit: xml-axis/c/src/wcg WSClass.cpp > > > > > > susantha 2003/07/23 20:51:32 > > > > Modified: c/src/wcg WSClass.cpp > > Log: > > now WCG can generate wrapper classes for web services that passes and > returns complex types as well but not arrays > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.4 +2 -2 xml-axis/c/src/wcg/WSClass.cpp > > > > Index: WSClass.cpp > > =================================================================== > > RCS file: /home/cvs/xml-axis/c/src/wcg/WSClass.cpp,v > > retrieving revision 1.3 > > retrieving revision 1.4 > > diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 > > --- WSClass.cpp 18 Jul 2003 13:31:44 -0000 1.3 > > +++ WSClass.cpp 24 Jul 2003 03:51:31 -0000 1.4 > > @@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ > > file << "}" << endl; > > file << endl; > > > > - file << "void" << m_Name << "::OnFault(IMessageData* pMsg)" << endl; > > + file << "void " << m_Name << "::OnFault(IMessageData* pMsg)" << endl; > > file << "{" << endl; > > file << "}" << endl; > > file << endl; > > @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ > > file << "\tstring method = name;" << endl; > > file << "\tISoapMethod* pMethod = > mc->getSoapSerializer()->createSoapMethod();" << endl; > > file << "\tpMethod->setLocalName(method + \"Response\");" << endl; > > - file << "\tpMethod->setPrefix(\"" << "amp" << "\");"<< endl; //amp - > axis method prefix :) > > + file << "\tpMethod->setPrefix(" << > "mc->getSoapSerializer()->getNewNamespacePrefix()" << ");"<< endl; > //amp - axis method prefix :) > > file << "\tpMethod->setUri(\"" << g_ClassNamespaces[m_AWSName] << > "\");"<< endl; //http://www.opensource.lk will come from wsdd > > file << "\treturn SUCCESS;" << endl; > > file << "}" << endl; > > > > > > --------------- Lanka Software Foundation (http://www.opensource.lk) Promoting Open-Source Development in Sri Lanka. ---------------