Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-ws-axis-dev-archive@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 24534 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2003 22:05:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@ws.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-dev@ws.apache.org Received: (qmail 24525 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2003 22:05:36 -0000 Date: 6 Mar 2003 22:07:20 -0000 Message-ID: <20030306220720.6498.qmail@nagoya.betaversion.org> From: bugzilla@apache.org To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org Cc: Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17303] - Invalid WSDL generated when using wrapped/literal X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17303 Invalid WSDL generated when using wrapped/literal ------- Additional Comments From rkellogg@micros.com 2003-03-06 22:07 ------- This recent attachment(03/06/03) demonstrates import problems with Visual Studio.NET 2003. Basically, I have a web service that takes 2 strings and returns a string. Three WSDD files are attached. They vary in how the service is encoded: - FAILS - FAILS - WORKS The generated WSDL from each deployment is included. It is my assumption, that I could have specified provider="java:RPC" and received the same results. All documents that I read, suggest you should always use document/literal encoding for .NET.