Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-axis-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 98215 invoked by uid 500); 1 Feb 2003 03:04:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 98157 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2003 03:04:24 -0000 Message-ID: <3E3B392C.9050704@cs.indiana.edu> Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 22:04:12 -0500 From: Aleksander Slominski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021126 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: wsif-dev@ws.apache.org CC: axis-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: WSIF mailing lists References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Nirmal Mukhi wrote: > Now that WSIF mailing lists are functional, I was going to change the > page on our web site (i.e. I'll change the forrest src etc.) to point > to wsif-dev and wsif-user instead of axis-dev and axis-user. So new > users can use those mailing lists instead of still being directed to > axis-*. Is that ok with all? sounds like a good idea and will be consistent with Feb 1 move of mailing lists to ws.apache.org. > Also note that we must monitor axis-* for the next few months for > [wsif] emails anyway. absolutely. alek -- "Mr. Pauli, we in the audience are all agreed that your theory is crazy. What divides us is whether it is crazy enough to be true." Niels H. D. Bohr