Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-axis-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 78287 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2003 18:05:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 78278 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2003 18:05:24 -0000 Message-ID: <3E31805B.9070702@cs.indiana.edu> Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 13:05:15 -0500 From: Aleksander Slominski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021126 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: [wsif] mailing list for WSIF [Re: WSIF to get its own mailing list?] References: <3E3170A2.10202@cs.indiana.edu> <3E317E2F.3090203@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <3E317E2F.3090203@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: 208.185.179.12.available.above.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sam Ruby wrote: > Aleksander Slominski wrote: > >> hi Tom, >> >> i agree with you. i think that what we need for WSIF is: (following >> guidelines described in http://ws.apache.org/mail.html): >> >> wsif-dev@ws.apache.org >> wsif-user@ws.apache.org >> wsif-cvs@ws.apache.org >> >> i wonder also if we could move WSIF to http://ws.apache.org/wsif? >> >> did i miss anything? > > > I have a strong preference for cvs messages to be redirected to the > appropriate dev list. This has two benefits: > > 1) ensures that there are more eyes reviewing every commit (or at > least, eliminates an excuse). > > 2) sends users fleeing to -user. ;-) it makes sense :-) maybe guidelines at http://ws.apache.org/mail.html could be annotated to point that using -dev may be preferred over separate -cvs? thanks, alek -- "Mr. Pauli, we in the audience are all agreed that your theory is crazy. What divides us is whether it is crazy enough to be true." Niels H. D. Bohr