axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aleksander Slominski <as...@cs.indiana.edu>
Subject Re: [wsif] irc chat log about final release
Date Fri, 24 Jan 2003 00:04:45 GMT
typically it is 10am EST.

alek

Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:

>Hi Alek,
>
>What time next Thu (for the post-2.0 chat)?
>
>Sanjiva.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Aleksander Slominski" <aslom@cs.indiana.edu>
>To: <axis-dev@xml.apache.org>
>Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 12:31 PM
>Subject: [wsif] irc chat log about final release
>
>
>  
>
>>hi,
>>
>>this was short chat as first official 2.0 version is almost ready,
>>    
>>
>remaining tasks
>  
>
>>* RC4 release Friday (jan 24th) and unless major problems are discovered
>>    
>>
>it is renamed to 2.0
>  
>
>>* no changes or new tasks until they are absolutely required as we want
>>    
>>
>RC4 to be final
>  
>
>>* everybody check current RC4 release (soon final 2.0) and report problems
>>* write release summary and detailed list of how samples were tested
>>* test more RC3 on linux and solaris (alek)
>>
>>next IRC chat is (tentatively) planned for Thursday Jan 30th to talk about
>>    
>>
>what is next to do after 2.0.
>  
>
>>thanks,
>>
>>alek
>>
>>chat log:
>>
>>[10:06] <nmukhi> We're all here (Jeremy, Ant, Owen, Mark)
>>[10:06] <nmukhi> Shall we start?
>>[10:07] <alek_s> i think so
>>[10:07] <nmukhi> let's wrap this up in 5 minutes, I want tpo eat my
>>    
>>
>sandwich
>  
>
>>[10:07] <alek_s> :-)
>>[10:08] <nmukhi> ok, so the RC3 is up and seems to be ok
>>[10:08] <nmukhi> the samples (except for JMS on JBoss) work
>>[10:08] <nmukhi> This morning all of us got together and went thru it,
>>    
>>
>made a list of minor changes
>  
>
>>[10:08] <nmukhi> I checked in minor doc changes, Owen will shortly add
>>    
>>
>WebSphere-setup docs for the
>  
>
>>J2EE samples
>>[10:09] <alek_s> i checked code on solaris
>>[10:09] <nmukhi> cool, solaris ok?
>>[10:09] <alek_s> and there is small chnage i check in for classpath.sh
>>[10:09] <nmukhi> great
>>[10:09] *** antElder (~ant@imhotep.hursley.ibm.com) has joined channel
>>    
>>
>#wsif
>  
>
>>[10:10] <nmukhi> We plan to run tests on the RC3 and if everything passes
>>    
>>
>we can cut the release
>  
>
>>tomorrow, what do you think?
>>[10:10] <nmukhi> The major condition is that there should be no code
>>    
>>
>change between the RC3 and the
>  
>
>>final release, if there is we will cut an RC4 and delay the final
>>[10:11] <alek_s> i would have one more day and RC4 tomorrow
>>[10:11] <alek_s> and then if it is OK to promote it to 2.0 release (on
>>    
>>
>monday?)
>  
>
>>[10:11] <alek_s> that gives more time for testing
>>[10:12] <nmukhi> true, but we will run the test suite today and that's it
>>[10:12] <alek_s> we need also write some release notes
>>[10:12] <nmukhi> we don't plan to test more than that, do you? if not I
>>    
>>
>don't see any reason to delay
>  
>
>>the release till Monday
>>[10:13] <nmukhi> yes, we need release notes
>>[10:13] <alek_s> did you check it on linux too?
>>[10:13] <nmukhi> no
>>[10:13] <nmukhi> could you?
>>[10:13] <alek_s> yes - but that will take a bit of time
>>[10:13] <nmukhi> ok
>>[10:14] <alek_s> i wanted also to get JBoss sampel to work ...
>>[10:14] <nmukhi> that doesn't work prolly because of a JBoss thing (it
>>    
>>
>works on WAS)
>  
>
>>[10:15] <nmukhi> If it is an ejb-jar.xml/jboss.xml change I don't mind
>>    
>>
>fixing it
>  
>
>>[10:15] <alek_s> what is the error?
>>[10:15] <nmukhi> but i wouldn't want to touch the MDB code or the client
>>    
>>
>code just to make JBoss happy
>  
>
>>(at least not right now)
>>[10:16] <nmukhi> don't know. some kind of connection failure. And the
>>    
>>
>behavior differs between runs
>  
>
>>(haven't investigated much)
>>[10:16] <alek_s> i see
>>[10:16] <nmukhi> have you seen the error?
>>[10:16] <nmukhi> it is possible it is my env
>>[10:16] <alek_s> but then we at least need to mention it in docs for this
>>    
>>
>release
>  
>
>>[10:17] <nmukhi> true, but i'd like you to first confirm it is a problem
>>    
>>
>(if it my machine then thereis
>  
>
>>no issue)
>>[10:17] <alek_s> ok
>>[10:18] <nmukhi> did you ever run the JMS thing successfully?
>>[10:18] <alek_s> no
>>[10:18] <alek_s> i thik i had wrong verion of Jboss downloaded ...
>>[10:19] <nmukhi> ok...I used 3.0.4 when it worked
>>[10:19] <alek_s> i have got this verion now
>>[10:19] <alek_s> and will try it
>>[10:19] <nmukhi> so if the JBoss run fails and there is no simple (i.e.
>>    
>>
>non code changing) fix we just
>  
>
>>document it
>>[10:19] <alek_s> did you run JCA sample?
>>[10:19] <nmukhi> no
>>[10:20] <nmukhi> I'm thinking that is prolly tested only on WAS
>>[10:20] <nmukhi> we should put that in docs I guess
>>[10:21] <nmukhi> ok so you want to write a list of outstanding tasks
>>    
>>
>before release, conditions under
>  
>
>>which we do an RC4, etc. to summarise?
>>[10:21] <alek_s> yes - to make clear what is tested and working
>>[10:21] *** Hesham (~hfahmy@199.246.40.54) has joined channel #wsif
>>[10:21] <Hesham> Hi all. sorry I'm late.. got snowed in this morning :(
>>[10:22] <alek_s> i thik all is finished we jsut need to do more testing on
>>    
>>
>more platforms (i check
>  
>
>>linux) and write down in what setups (WAS, JBoss?) samples work
>>[10:22] <alek_s> hi Hesh
>>[10:23] <nmukhi> Hesh I'm in Hursley, sitting here with JEremy and gang
>>[10:23] <nmukhi> Hesh did you try running the JCA sample under app server
>>    
>>
>other than WAS?
>  
>
>>[10:24] <Hesham> no. Only WAS 5.0
>>[10:24] <nmukhi> ok, we can mention that in the docs
>>[10:25] <alek_s> shoul dwe make a separate 2.0 release document or have it
>>    
>>
>as part of chnages.html?
>  
>
>>[10:25] <alek_s> we will need also to prepare -email announcement message
>>    
>>
>with list of what is in release
>  
>
>>[10:25] <nmukhi> I think separate: release notes = changes.html + summary?
>>[10:26] <nmukhi> can put summary portion of release notes in email
>>    
>>
>annoncement
>  
>
>>[10:26] <alek_s> yes
>>[10:27] <alek_s> so could we just summarize it and see if it is OK with
>>    
>>
>everybody or what is needed more?
>  
>
>>[10:28] <alek_s> 1. more test ing on linux and solaris (alek)
>>[10:28] <nmukhi> ok
>>[10:28] <alek_s> 2. write release summary and detaield list of how samples
>>    
>>
>were tested
>  
>
>>[10:29] <alek_s> is there any reason to hurry to make release tomorow
>>    
>>
>instead of RC4 (that will be then
>  
>
>>promoted to 2.0 release soon)?
>>[10:29] <nmukhi> on (2) we just update existing sample docs
>>[10:29] <alek_s> that leaves more time for testing
>>[10:30] <alek_s> yes
>>[10:32] <nmukhi> do you plan to cut RC4 and then cut 2.0 again?
>>[10:33] <nmukhi> or is it just renaming rc4 to 2.0?
>>[10:33] <alek_s> i was thinking: 2.0 == RC4 jsut renaming
>>[10:33] <alek_s> just renaming
>>[10:33] <nmukhi> ok, we'll need to make sure tags for both exist
>>[10:33] <nmukhi> and are the same
>>[10:34] <alek_s> yes
>>[10:36] <nmukhi> cut RC4 tomorrow and rename on Monday?
>>[10:37] <alek_s> that what i awas thining
>>[10:37] <nmukhi> i.e. promote on Monday?
>>[10:37] <alek_s> yes
>>[10:37] <alek_s> is there something else that is maybe forgotten?
>>[10:38] <alek_s> or anything else related to release we should tals about?
>>[10:38] <nmukhi> ok we'll cut RC4 here, sounds fine? tomorrow afternoon UK
>>    
>>
>time?
>  
>
>>[10:39] <alek_s> soudns fine
>>[10:39] <Hesham> sounds good to me
>>[10:39] <alek_s> should be enoiugh time to do any small chnages if needed
>>[10:39] <nmukhi> And there shoulod be absolutely no change at all to RC4,
>>    
>>
>only then we promote it to 2.0
>  
>
>>[10:40] <alek_s> i hope so
>>[10:40] <alek_s> (or we do RC5 ...)
>>[10:41] <nmukhi> sounds ok?
>>[10:42] <nmukhi> rc5 in the worst case (I hope not)
>>[10:42] <Hesham> sounds good. Hopefully no RC5..
>>[10:42] <alek_s> that will be great to see 2.0 release real soon now :-)
>>[10:43] <nmukhi> ok then, are we done?
>>[10:44] <alek_s> i will post irc log
>>[10:44] <alek_s> to encourage more people to try out RC3
>>[10:44] <alek_s> i will also remove no longer relvant parts from
>>    
>>
>RELEASE_NOTES.txt
>  
>
>>[10:44] *** Signoff: wsif_bot (*.net *.split)
>>[10:44] *** Signoff: nmukhi (*.net *.split)
>>[10:45] <Hesham> ok.
>>[10:45] <antElder> ok
>>[10:45] <alek_s> i think we had net plit
>>[10:45] <antElder> (nirmal lost his connection and can't get back on, but
>>    
>>
>says ok also)
>  
>
>>[10:45] <antElder> (and Jeremy)
>>[10:46] <alek_s> ok
>>[10:46] <alek_s> then it is officially finished (short meeeting ae good
>>    
>>
>meetings :-))
>  
>
>>[10:46] <Hesham> bye
>>[10:46] <alek_s> bye
>>[10:46] <antElder> ok talk againg later, bye
>>--
>>"Mr. Pauli, we in the audience are all agreed that your theory is crazy.
>>What divides us is whether it is crazy enough to be true." Niels H. D.
>>    
>>
>Bohr
>  
>
>>    
>>
>
>  
>

-- 
"Mr. Pauli, we in the audience are all agreed that your theory is crazy. 
What divides us is whether it is crazy enough to be true." Niels H. D. Bohr



Mime
View raw message