Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-axis-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 9039 invoked by uid 500); 11 Dec 2002 20:00:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 9030 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2002 20:00:12 -0000 Message-ID: From: Glen Daniels To: "'axis-dev@xml.apache.org'" Subject: RE: Web Services top-level project (was Re: [AXIS/WSIF] proposed new WSIF home page URL) Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 15:00:18 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N +1 > -----Original Message----- > From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:dims@yahoo.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 2:42 PM > To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org > Subject: Re: Web Services top-level project (was Re: [AXIS/WSIF] > proposed new WSIF home page URL) > > > I agree. One community would be better. > > -- dims > > --- Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote: > > "Sam Ruby" writes: > > [snip] > > > > > > We *could* go down the path where the code is partitioned > up very finely > > > with individual access rights to each, but if history is > any guide, the > > > likely result is duplication and invention of isolation layers. > > > > I agree; we're better off having one community of developers. Even > > in a single community, developers will tend to focus on their area > > of strength/interest; so the necessary separation occurs naturally. > > > > Sanjiva. > > > > > ===== > Davanum Srinivas - http://xml.apache.org/~dims/ > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. > http://mailplus.yahoo.com >