axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Russell Butek <>
Subject RE: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/test/wsdl/interop4/groupH/complexRP Cenc
Date Mon, 07 Oct 2002 15:19:13 GMT

Whoa!  You will merge interop4 to HEAD!?!?!  I'll veto that right now.  It
doesn't pass functional-tests!  We NEED to keep the head branch clean.

Russell Butek

Tom Jordahl <> on 10/07/2002 09:27:39 AM

Please respond to

To:    "''" <>
Subject:    RE: cvs commit:
       xml-axis/java/test/wsdl/interop4/groupH/complexRP    Cenc

OK, Dims needs both the header and interop4 branch.
We don't pass all-tests, but Dims said he would fix that as Glen and I are
still working on the interop tests (which is much higher priority).

So Glen and I will merge interop4 to HEAD.
Dims will take a look at fixing the functional-tests which fail.
The header stuff can go it also.

I am not happy with putting our source tree in to a CVS cuisinart mere
hours before walking in to the interop, but it seems we have no choice.

Tom Jordahl
Macromedia Server Development

-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Ruby []
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 9:56 AM
Subject: RE: cvs commit:

Sam Ruby
 > But Glen and I have been running hard and fast (particularly with
 > respect to running all the functional tests before check in ;-) so we
 > didn't want to mess up the world.
 > The tests don't pass right now on the branch, otherwise I would say
 > we should merge to HEAD and continue our work.  We still have lots of
 > work to do today (doc/lit faults).  Have you had a chance to work on
 > the attachment tests Sam?  I think that is our biggest hole for
 > tomorrow.

So the plan is to go into soapbuilders with a version of Axis that
doesn't pass the functional tests?  I'm not sure that is wise.

 > In any case, is someone wants to pick up the interop4 branch and fix
 > the functional tests today, that would be great, otherwise we can
 > just wait till after the interop.

Anything I check in will be on the HEAD.

- Sam Ruby

View raw message