axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tom Jordahl <t...@macromedia.com>
Subject RE: What fixes are now in R 1.0?
Date Wed, 02 Oct 2002 14:32:56 GMT

Rick,

See http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=axis-dev&m=103339449319208&w=2

This plan was approved via Email and on the Conference call that followed it (which I believe
you were a part of).

We are in truckstopper mode: Would you run after the truck taking the CDs away to fix this
bug?

--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia Server Development



-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Rineholt [mailto:rineholt@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 10:25 AM
To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: RE: What fixes are now in R 1.0?



Tom,
I don't remember  us agreeing on " automatic -1, or the overwhelming
agreement on inclusion".   I would have -1 that plan.  I think if someone
has gone to the trouble of asking  something to be put in and someone
disagrees it deserves a  REAL -1 reply AND a some reason why.
The approach I would have liked seen is:

A note:
These fixes have been asked to be submitted to R 1.0 branch with no -1 for
the last two days:
- Fix 1
- Fix 2
etc
If no -1's are made by end of the day they WILL be merged in tonight.

If this wasn't too much of a burden.



Rick Rineholt
"The truth is out there...  All you need is a better search engine!"

rineholt@us.ibm.com



Tom Jordahl <tomj@macromedia.com> on 10/02/2002 10:01:42 AM

Please respond to axis-dev@xml.apache.org

To:    "'axis-dev@xml.apache.org'" <axis-dev@xml.apache.org>
cc:
Subject:    RE: What fixes are now in R 1.0?




No fixes have been merged in to 1.0 since rc2 was built on Monday.
Perhaps it would help if there was a summary of fixes that are in
consideration?

My take on it is that NO src/* fixes will be approved (automatic -1 from
Sam) unless we have an overwhelming agreement on inclusion.

My take on the only two changes I wouldn't -1:
isConvertable() change: +1
 - it is a regression
 - it is low risk

servlet.jar change: +1
 - 'look like dorks' bug
 - another regression
 - medium-low risk


All doc/* and samples/* files should be merged from HEAD in to 1.0 before
the final build.  It would also not be unreasonable for **/build.xml to be
merged also, but this should be case by case.

In all cases, Sam Ruby is the final authority on what gets merged as he is
the release manager.
--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia Server Development



-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Rineholt [mailto:rineholt@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:53 AM
To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: What fixes are now in R 1.0?


I've asked for some fixes voted into R 1.0 without any -1's and I've seen
others do the same, but not sure except doing diffs and being familiar with
all the changes to determine what has been accepted in R1.0.  Is there
another way and I just missed it?   (except the diff solution :-)

Rick Rineholt
"The truth is out there...  All you need is a better search engine!"

rineholt@us.ibm.com






Mime
View raw message