axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Davanum Srinivas <d...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Merge of i4 stuff
Date Tue, 08 Oct 2002 11:10:00 GMT
Awesome....My Vote is for #1 (code up real support for this kind of thing) that was reason
for
checking in the test case :)

-- dims

--- Glen Daniels <gdaniels@macromedia.com> wrote:
> 
> I4 is now merged over to HEAD, ant clean all-tests passed multiple times.
> 
> The last problem was with the terra test - which I think is a bad test as it stands,
because it
> relies on broken behavior to "succeed".  We get XML back with a value of an <xsd:list>
type and
> try to deserialize it - the test was failing with the change I made in BeanDeserializer
to be
> more correct about throwing errors when a deserializer can't be found.  It succeeds with
the old
> code in there because we'll use a "blank" DeserializerImpl by default if we can't find
the right
> deserializer, and that ends up with a null value for the field rather than an exception
thrown.
> 
> We don't currently support <xsd:list> style enumerations.  We should, I think,
either 1) code up
> real support for this kind of thing, 2) throw errors when we encounter these constructs
in WSDL,
> or 3) generate MessageElement/SOAPElement placeholders when we encounter them in WSDL.
 Comments
> about this in BeanDeserializer.onStartChild().  Once we resolve this, we should put the
> exception throwing code back in.
> 
> Dims, this was your baby - opinions?
> 
> --Glen


=====
Davanum Srinivas - http://xml.apache.org/~dims/

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
http://faith.yahoo.com

Mime
View raw message