axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Davanum Srinivas <d...@yahoo.com>
Subject RE: rc2 status
Date Mon, 30 Sep 2002 14:14:07 GMT
+1 to Tom's proposal.

Thanks,
dims

--- R J Scheuerle Jr <scheu@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> +1 to Tom's proposal.
> 
> Rich Scheuerle
> IBM WebSphere & Axis Web Services Development
> 512-838-5115  (IBM TL 678-5115)
> 
> 
>                                                                                     
           
>                                 
>                       Tom Jordahl                                                   
           
>                                 
>                       <tomj@macromedia.        To:       "'axis-dev@xml.apache.org'"
> <axis-dev@xml.apache.org>                   
>                       com>                     cc:                               
              
>                                 
>                                                Subject:  RE: rc2 status             
           
>                                 
>                       09/30/2002 09:00                                              
           
>                                 
>                       AM                                                            
           
>                                 
>                       Please respond to                                             
           
>                                 
>                       axis-dev                                                      
           
>                                 
>                                                                                     
           
>                                 
>                                                                                     
           
>                                 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I am in agreement with Sam and Russell.  I never voted for putting
> *everything* in, nor did I agree with the message calling for such an
> action.
> 
> While I did have defects that I requested be merged in to 1.0, there were
> for 1.0 targeted bugs ONLY.  I am an automatic +1 to any and all
> documentation and samples changes, because this is where users look first.
> But I am NOT in favor of much more going in at all.  This is why we
> branched.
> 
> In particular, a change of mine that did get merged in I sent a note about
> Friday expressing my concerns that it needed a serious peer review and that
> it had a medium-high risk factor on it.  It only got a single +1 from Rich.
> 
> Here is my proposal:
> 
> 1. Release some sort of RC (2 or 3?) today with the 1.0 branch and all of
> its changes.  Get it in to the hands of the users - NOW.
> 
> 2. Automatically merge any changes from HEAD to 1.0 in the directories doc
> and samples but NOT src.
> 
> 3. Authorize Sam to clamp down HARD (truck stopper mode) on any source
> changes - i.e. automatic VETO on everything unless it is a serious
> regression caused by all of these bug fixes.  Russell and myself will back
> him up with -1 votes on merge requests (unless its one of ours of course
> :-).
> 
> 4. Release 1.0 and get on with 1.1 on HEAD.
> 
> Committers - what do YOU think?
> 
> --
> Tom Jordahl
> Macromedia Server Development
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russell Butek [mailto:butek@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 9:06 AM
> To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org
> Subject: Re: rc2 status
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I would really like to stop this Friday, so I agree with Sam.  If you
> notice, I've been silent on a number of the votes because I don't think we
> need them for 1.0.  I haven't gone so far as to veto anything, but I've
> also noticed that some things didn't get the minimum 3 votes, so maybe
> other folks are voting like I am by not voting?  I myself have nothing more
> to get in.  The two items I opened a vote for last week (and which DID get
> enough votes) were required to pass the JAX-RPC TCK, which could be
> considered dork-category things - it would be somewhat embarrassing not to
> pass the TCK when we've been saying all along that AXIS is a JAX-RPC
> implementation.
> 
> (By the way, Sam, any more thoughts on the lone failure in your automated
> TCK run?)
> 
> Russell Butek
> butek@us.ibm.com
> 
> 
> Sam Ruby <rubys@apache.org> on 09/27/2002 04:27:01 PM
> 
> Please respond to axis-dev@xml.apache.org
> 
> To:    axis-dev@xml.apache.org
> cc:
> Subject:    Re: rc2 status
> 
> 
> 
> Richard Sitze wrote:
> > +1 to releasing ALL changes todate.
> 
> The objective here is to slow down and eventually stop at some point.  I
> really would like to change the prevailing sentiment from "I see nothing
> obviously wrong with that change so it should be included" to "I really
> think that we would look like dorks unless that particular change was
> included".
> 
> - Sam Ruby
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


=====
Davanum Srinivas - http://xml.apache.org/~dims/

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

Mime
View raw message