Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-axis-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 88461 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jul 2002 20:23:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 88452 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2002 20:23:20 -0000 Message-ID: <024101c23287$05bab0d0$1219570f@ranier> From: "Steve Loughran" To: References: Subject: Re: cvs commit: xml-axis/java buildTest.xml Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 13:24:59 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 12:58 PM Subject: Re: cvs commit: xml-axis/java buildTest.xml > Stepping up to 1.5 may be a concern for users who are dependent on an > earlier version of ant for a different project. > > Unless there is some compelling function that we need, I am +0 about > requiring users to step up to 1.5. > > Maybe we should conduct a poll on axis-user. Give the community a week to > decide. one thing is if there are only some test files that depend on it, then we somehow only run them on ant1.5. There is no formal version test, but that is what is for.