axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tom Jordahl <t...@macromedia.com>
Subject RE: [jsr110-eg-disc] QName (COMMITTERS PLEASE READ)
Date Thu, 20 Jun 2002 18:30:10 GMT
 
Sweet, problem solved.  No compat issue because we didn't have the API, right?
 
--
Tom Jordahl
 
-----Original Message-----
From: butek@us.ibm.com [mailto:butek@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 2:12 PM
To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: RE: [jsr110-eg-disc] QName (COMMITTERS PLEASE READ)


The old AXIS QName didn't have the valueOf method, so old stuff would never get confused.
Just my 2 cents.

Russell Butek
butek@us.ibm.com



Please respond to axis-dev@xml.apache.org 


To: <axis-dev@xml.apache.org>
cc: 
Subject: RE: [jsr110-eg-disc] QName (COMMITTERS PLEASE READ)



Sam,
Since you're not 1.0, and theoretically people shouldn't be relying on
this behaviour in your implementation, the answer is, there's no
compelling reason to support it, but it's a nice to have in case anyone
actually was relying on it.
I just piped up because I thought it was an "obvious" alternative, and
works out better in that the localPart wouldn't end up in an illegal
state through attempting to use the old Axis form.

--Wes

-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Ruby [ mailto:rubys@us.ibm.com <mailto:rubys@us.ibm.com> ]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 12:10 PM
To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jsr110-eg-disc] QName (COMMITTERS PLEASE READ)

Wes Moulder wrote:

> Ya'll might not like me stepping in here, but I have two questions
> about this:
>

Hi Wes! You are always welcome here.

> a) isn't a local part of "one:two" illegal?
>

I would think so...

> b) Why not make your QName do both from the valueOf() method?
>

I'm a bit concerned about how code that depended on this feature would
react if, some how, another implementation of this interface were to be
picked up in the classpath. Is there a compelling need to support this
other syntax?

> It should be trivially easy to figure out which one of the two forms
> the string is in, and since a : is illegal in an NCName (what the
> localpart is defined as), it shouldn't be difficult to figure out
> which form it's in.
>

I agree that technically it would not be difficult.

- Sam Ruby




Mime
View raw message