axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aleksander Slominski <as...@cs.indiana.edu>
Subject Re: [WSIF] Proposed package name changes
Date Fri, 07 Jun 2002 20:35:30 GMT
hi,

those are good ideas - i was thinking about 1), 2) and 3) too.

this kind of changes may be affecting WSIF users
so it becomes even more important to clearly define
what is WSIF API and what is implementation to
minimize effect of WSIF changes to code that is
using it ...

i think that clearly package as described in 4)
should be an implementation detail and not part of
visible API.

there should be also better dependency checking
in build.xml to avoid lot of errors when WSDL4J
is not available (and probably removed or changed
JLogFormatter.java to not import com.ibm.logging.Formatter).

i would do some of those modifications to buid.xml
but i want first to be sure that wsif transition to this repository is
finished.

thanks,

alek

ps. it is probably good idea to remove from xml-axis CVS
proposal/wsif-1.2 or at least to write there README
pointing to new repository.

Owen D Burroughs wrote:

> We would like to propose the following changes to packages and classes
> within WSIF:
>
> 1)  Move org.apache.wsif.stub.WSIFUtils.java to
> org.apache.wsif.util.WSIFUtils.java
>
> 2)  Move org.apache.wsif.stub.WSIFPrivateWSDLFactory.java to
> org.apache.wsif.wsdl.WSIFPrivateWSDLFactory.java
>
> 3)  Remove the org.apache.wsif.stub package.
>
> 4)  Create a new package called org.apache.wsif.base and move all of the
> org.apache.wsif.util.WSIFDefault* classes to it.
>
> Comments and other ideas are very welcome.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Owen
>
> -------------------------------------
> Owen Burroughs
> WSIF Development team


Mime
View raw message