axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanj...@watson.ibm.com>
Subject Re: WSIF proposal
Date Thu, 16 May 2002 14:02:48 GMT
Hi Dims,

I agree we don't have enough to create a WS project yet. Why not
just create new projects under XML until that condition is met?

So I'd vote for xml-wsif and org.apache.wsif.*. I agree with Dug
that consistency is important.

I'm planning on working on the WSDL validator this summer with
some volunteers I've picked up here in Sri Lanka. org.apache.axis.wsdl
just makes no sense to me.

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Davanum Srinivas" <dims@yahoo.com>
To: <axis-dev@xml.apache.org>; "Paul Fremantle" <pzf@hursley.ibm.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 7:32 PM
Subject: Re: WSIF proposal


> Paul,
>
> Here's an excerpt from Dug's email:
> >> "If it has its own cvs tree then it seems odd to have "axis" in the
name.
> >> It doesn't really matter much to me as long as the names are
consistent,
> >> either they both have "axis" or neither do.
> >> -Dug"
>
> I agree with Dug's view that we need to be consistent. Since WebServices
story will not happen
> overnight...My personal view is that we can drop axis from the package
name when it happens.
>
> Thanks,
> dims
>
> --- Paul Fremantle <pzf@hursley.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Dims
> >
> > If we are going to move to an overall WebServices story, I'd rather not
name
> > the package org.apache.axis.wsif.*
> >
> > Apart from the length :-) I'd prefer that we kept a simple package name.
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Davanum Srinivas" <dims@yahoo.com>
> > To: <axis-dev@xml.apache.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 1:00 PM
> > Subject: Re: WSIF proposal
> >
> >
> > > Sanjiva,
> > >
> > > I agree that Web Services needs its own top level project. But we
don't
> > have enough "stuff" to do
> > > so. IMHO we need more initiatives targeting various portions of the
Web
> > Services protocol stack
> > > before we can do so. Using Axis as an incubator is a step in that
> > direction.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > dims
> > >
> > > --- Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > > > What do you think?  I proposed xml-axis-wsif, because I know that
> > there is
> > > > > some view of Axis as "brand" for apache web services. WSIF isn't
> > really an
> > > >
> > > > I don't agree that Axis is a brand for Apache Web services! Axis
> > > > as created as the Apache SOAP replacement project and I continue to
> > > > support it as the next gen Apache SOAP implementation.
> > > >
> > > > I don't think it would make any sense to say that all Apache Web
> > > > services things are named org.apache.axis.<stuff>.
> > > >
> > > > I agree with Sam that Web services needs its own top level project.
XML
> > > > is very much a part of Web services, as is a bunch of stuff from
> > Jakarta.
> > > >
> > > > Sanjiva.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > =====
> > > Davanum Srinivas - http://xml.apache.org/~dims/
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
> > > http://launch.yahoo.com
> >
>
>
> =====
> Davanum Srinivas - http://xml.apache.org/~dims/
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
> http://launch.yahoo.com


Mime
View raw message