axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simon Fell <>
Subject Re: Wrapped vs. Document
Date Sat, 06 Apr 2002 00:14:44 GMT
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 16:37:56 -0500 , in soap you wrote:

>>Are you aware of any other vendors that use the "wrapped" style?  Don't you
>>think that using a part name (and the fact that there is only one) as a
>>means of discriminating between "document" and "wrapped" is fairly delicate?
>>I appreciate that this might be pedantry, but what if I wanted "document",
>>not "wrapped" and named the single part "parameters"?
>> I believe that the IONA folks are supporting this as well. I agree
>> with you that keying off the part name is a pretty flaky approach.
>What would you think we should key from?  This is fairly reliable right now as this is
how Microsoft (and others?) are creating the WSDL.

Ideally, the definition of rpc/literal would be fixed, so that this
style of use becomes rpc/literal. In the mean time, i think it should
be a tool option, and not driven by things in the WSDL

>It is likely that in the future we will provide a WSDL2Java switch to turn off this heuristic
>and just do straight-up doc/lit stuff.

cool. :)


View raw message