Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-axis-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 93501 invoked by uid 500); 4 Dec 2001 17:06:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 93449 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2001 17:06:19 -0000 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: --package switch for Wsdl2java To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.5 September 22, 2000 Message-ID: From: "Sam Ruby" Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 12:06:13 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D04NM201/04/M/IBM(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 12/04/2001 12:05:23 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Tom Jordal wrote: > > On re-reading the section, here is what is vague: > > Section 4.3.1: > "Note that the JAX-RPC 1.0 specification does not specify the standard > mapping of a namespace definition (in a WSDL document) to the corresponding > Java package name." > > So there is no specified way to convert a namespace to a package name. I personally don't find that vague. There is no standard mapping (e.g., convert slashes to underscores) between namespaces and packages. This means that an option like --PkgToNS is required so that the user can provide the additional information. > I think that was a little condescending Sam. Please stop it. I apologize if made the statement in a way that offended you, but it remains my opinion that this discussion has gotten emotional. And I stand by my opinion that every few months voting to add and remove a function is not my idea of fun. - Sam Ruby