Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-xml-axis-dev-archive@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 96421 invoked by uid 500); 12 Nov 2001 14:16:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact axis-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list axis-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 96411 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2001 14:16:33 -0000 Importance: Normal Subject: Re: Internationalization question To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7 March 21, 2001 Message-ID: From: "Russell Butek" Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 08:15:33 -0600 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D04NMS23/04/M/IBM(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 11/12/2001 09:16:27 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Being new to apache, I haven't a clue how to move Wsdl2java to its own project. I wouldn't have a problem with it, I just don't know what it takes. If we DID move it, though, we'd still have part of it - probably the biggest part - in AXIS. We're moving the design of Wsdl2java in a direction where the AXIS-specific stuff is separable from the WSDL stuff (ie, WSDL4J and DOM structures + a few of our own) so that someone could write their own back-end code generators. So if this WERE in it's own project, it wouldn't be a very big project since most of the design is WSDL4J and DOM. Russell Butek butek@us.ibm.com "Sanjiva Weerawarana" on 11/11/2001 08:42:52 AM Please respond to axis-dev@xml.apache.org To: cc: Subject: Re: Internationalization question I'd like to encourage you again to move WSDL2Java to its own project.. its useful for more than Axis-Java! Sanjiva. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Russell Butek" To: Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 4:16 AM Subject: Internationalization question > We have 2 'tools' in AXIS (at least that's all I know about): tcpmon and > Wsdl2java. > > tcpmon was designed to be it's own beast independent of AXIS and because of > this I'm going to create a separate properties file for it's translatable > messages. > > But what about Wsdl2java? It doesn't depend on AXIS, but it's certainly > more in cahoots with AXIS than tcpmon. If I put Wsdl2java strings into > org/apache/axis/utils/resources.properties, then it will now have a > dependency on AXIS (the properties file and JavaUtils). But is that bad? > Will Wsdl2java ever exist outside of AXIS? > > I am inclined to simply treat Wsdl2java like all other axis code wrt > internationalization. If we decide to tear it away in the future we can > revisit the issue then. > > Russell Butek > butek@us.ibm.com