axis-java-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Berin Loritsch <blorit...@apache.org>
Subject Re: QName's
Date Mon, 01 Oct 2001 19:01:26 GMT
Doug Davis wrote:
> 
> oh geez, you're opening a can of worms with that one!
> I'll leave that for a different day...  8-)
> -Dug

Do we really have that much overlap?

Quick question, are the classes in org.apache.axis.rpc.**
equivalent to JAX-RPC?

> 
> Berin Loritsch <bloritsch@apache.org> on 10/01/2001 02:53:13 PM
> 
> Please respond to axis-dev@xml.apache.org
> 
> To:   axis-dev@xml.apache.org
> cc:
> Subject:  Re: QName's
> 
> Doug Davis wrote:
> >
> > Between our code and wsdl4j's we getting quite a few QName classes.
> > Would there be any objection to using the one in
> > org.apache.axis.rpc.encoding.QName
> > instead of org.apache.axis.utils.QName ?  Or would people prefer if we
> > waited a little while longer?  (Yes, I'll make sure everything in the old
> > QName is
> > in the new one).
> > -Dug
> 
> +10  Definitely, The API should only have one version of any class name.
> I don't like class names that are the same but in different packages.
> They only cause trouble (i.e. like javax.swing.Timer and java.util.Timer
> in JDK 1.3).

Mime
View raw message